Difference between revisions of "Muller2016"
(published) |
m (url) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=9 | |Number=9 | ||
|Pages=705-717 | |Pages=705-717 | ||
− | |URL= | + | |URL=https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416660580 |
|DOI=10.1177/1077800416660580 | |DOI=10.1177/1077800416660580 | ||
|Abstract=This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery. | |Abstract=This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 06:02, 27 September 2017
Muller2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Muller2016 |
Author(s) | Sophie Merit Müller |
Title | Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Reflexivity in Ethnography |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnography, Ethnomethodology, Reflexivity, Practice, Body, Ballet |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Qualitative Inquiry |
Volume | 22 |
Number | 9 |
Pages | 705-717 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1077800416660580 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery.
Notes