Difference between revisions of "Muller2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sophie Merit Müller |Title=Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Reflexivity in Ethnography |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnography;...") |
(published) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Sophie Merit Müller | |Author(s)=Sophie Merit Müller | ||
|Title=Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Reflexivity in Ethnography | |Title=Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Reflexivity in Ethnography | ||
− | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnography; Ethnomethodology; Reflexivity; Practice; Body; Ballet; | |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnography; Ethnomethodology; Reflexivity; Practice; Body; Ballet | ||
|Key=Muller2016 | |Key=Muller2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
|Journal=Qualitative Inquiry | |Journal=Qualitative Inquiry | ||
+ | |Volume=22 | ||
+ | |Number=9 | ||
+ | |Pages=705-717 | ||
|URL=http://qix.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/08/04/1077800416660580.abstract | |URL=http://qix.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/08/04/1077800416660580.abstract | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1077800416660580 | |DOI=10.1177/1077800416660580 | ||
|Abstract=This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery. | |Abstract=This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery. | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 06:01, 27 September 2017
Muller2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Muller2016 |
Author(s) | Sophie Merit Müller |
Title | Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Reflexivity in Ethnography |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnography, Ethnomethodology, Reflexivity, Practice, Body, Ballet |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Qualitative Inquiry |
Volume | 22 |
Number | 9 |
Pages | 705-717 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1077800416660580 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery.
Notes