Difference between revisions of "Morriss2016"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lisa Morriss; |Title=Dirty secrets and being ‘strange’: using ethnomethodology to move beyond familiarity |Tag(s)=emotions in qual...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Lisa Morriss; | + | |Author(s)=Lisa Morriss; |
|Title=Dirty secrets and being ‘strange’: using ethnomethodology to move beyond familiarity | |Title=Dirty secrets and being ‘strange’: using ethnomethodology to move beyond familiarity | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=emotions in qualitative research, ethnomethodology, familiarity, insider research; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; emotions in qualitative research, ethnomethodology, familiarity, insider research; |
|Key=Morriss2016 | |Key=Morriss2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Qualitative Research | |Journal=Qualitative Research | ||
|Volume=16 | |Volume=16 | ||
Revision as of 07:42, 8 January 2018
| Morriss2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Morriss2016 |
| Author(s) | Lisa Morriss |
| Title | Dirty secrets and being ‘strange’: using ethnomethodology to move beyond familiarity |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, emotions in qualitative research, ethnomethodology, familiarity, insider research |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Research |
| Volume | 16 |
| Number | 5 |
| Pages | 526 –540 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1177/1468794115598194 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The paper is a discussion of my attempt to move beyond familiarity by using ethnomethodology – and the emotional impact of doing so; namely, the feeling of having a ‘dirty secret’. As a social work group member interviewing social workers, the process of fieldwork was all too familiar. However, during transcription and analysis, what I had considered to be ‘business as usual’ was revealed as something more complex. The paper describes how the ethnomethodological notions of being a member, the unique adequacy requirement of methods, and breaching worked to make the familiar strange and became key to my understanding.
Notes
