Difference between revisions of "Mondada2000d"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2014-10-06 10:05:04)
 
m (encoding caracter issue)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 +
|BibType=ARTICLE
 +
|Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada;
 +
|Title=La construction du savoir dans les discussions scientifiques : apport de la linguistique interactionnelle et de l'analyse conversationnelle à la sociologie des sciences
 +
|Tag(s)=EMCA
 
|Key=Mondada2000d
 
|Key=Mondada2000d
|Key=Mondada2000d
 
|Title=La construction du savoir dans les discussions scientifiques : apport de la linguistique interactionnelle et de lâ��analyse conversationnelle à la sociologie des sciences
 
|Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
 
|Year=2000
 
|Year=2000
 
|Journal=Revue Suisse de Sociologie
 
|Journal=Revue Suisse de Sociologie

Revision as of 02:49, 6 October 2014

Mondada2000d
BibType ARTICLE
Key Mondada2000d
Author(s) Lorenza Mondada
Title La construction du savoir dans les discussions scientifiques : apport de la linguistique interactionnelle et de l'analyse conversationnelle à la sociologie des sciences
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA
Publisher
Year 2000
Language
City
Month
Journal Revue Suisse de Sociologie
Volume 26
Number 3
Pages 615–636
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper aims at discussing the possible interdisciplinary similarities between a linguistic approach focussed on scientific interaction and inspired by conversation analysis and a sociological approach focussed on the academic practices and inspired by ethnomethodology and the actor-network theory. First, we present some common principles characterizing both approaches; then we develop an empirical analysis of scientific discussions recorded within four research groups. This analysis deals with the procedures by which participants provide a response to a proposal, either adopting or rejecting it. It shows how interactional linguistics can contribute to the description of emergent processes of knowledge construction within the situated practices of research teams.

Notes