McArthur2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 13:40, 28 August 2019 by BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2019-08-28 07:40:13)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
McArthur2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key McArthur2019
Author(s) Amanda McArthur
Title Pain and the collision of expertise in primary care physical exams
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, medical EMCA, deixis, doctor-patient communication, embodied behavior, expertise, glottal cutoffs, institutional talk, pain, pain displays, physical examination, primary care, question-response sequences, response delay, touch, American English
Publisher
Year 2019
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 21
Number 5
Pages 522-539
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445619846707
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Using conversation analysis and a collection of naturally occurring US primary care consultations, this article explores the search for pain during primary care physical exams. Inhabiting this activity is a ‘collision’ of expertise between physicians’ clinical knowledge about bodies and patients’ knowledge about their bodies. I show how patients responding to questions like does that hurt? tacitly guide physicians to their pain using pain displays, glottal cutoffs and response delays to observably react to the physician’s touch, delineating painful from non- or less-painful areas. Physicians respond to these practices by altering the trajectory of their touch in coordination with the patient’s embodied behavior. In this local context, physicians’ touch not only constrains patients to (dis)affirm pain in a particular location, but it is also a unique affordance for patients to guide physicians while nonetheless preserving the physician’s authority over where to test for pain, thereby maintaining the physical examination activity framework.

Notes