Kuttner2018

From emcawiki
Revision as of 09:39, 19 July 2018 by BurakTekin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Uwe-A. Küttner |Title=Investigating Inferences in Sequences of Action: The Case of Claiming “Just-Now” Recollection with Oh That’...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Kuttner2018
BibType ARTICLE
Key Kuttner2018
Author(s) Uwe-A. Küttner
Title Investigating Inferences in Sequences of Action: The Case of Claiming “Just-Now” Recollection with Oh That’s Right
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Interactional Linguistics, inferences, action recognition, forgetfulness, confusion, recollection, oh that’s right
Publisher
Year 2018
Language English
City
Month
Journal Open Linguistics
Volume 4
Number 1
Pages 101-126
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0006
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper offers an exploratory Interactional Linguistic account of the role that inferences play in episodes of ordinary conversational interaction. To this end, it systematically reconsiders the conversational practice of using the lexico-syntactic format oh that’s right to implicitly claim “just-now” recollection of something previously known, but momentarily confused or forgotten. The analyses reveal that this practice typically occurs as part of a larger sequential pattern that the participants orient to and which serves as a procedure for dealing with, and generating an account for, one participant’s production of an inapposite action. As will be shown, the instantiation and progressive realization of this sequential procedure requires local inferential work from the participants. While some facets of this inferential work appear to be shaped by the particular context of the ongoing interaction, others are integral to the workings of the sequence as such. Moreover, the analyses suggest that participants’ understanding of oh that’s right as embodying an implicit memory claim rests on an inference which is based on a kind of semanticpragmatic compositionality. The paper thus illustrates how inferences in conversational interaction can be systematically studied and points to the merits of combining an interactional and a linguistic perspective.

Notes