Difference between revisions of "Kuettner2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Uwe-A. Küttner; |Title=At the intersection of stance-management and repair: Meta-pragmatic claims as a practice for disarming disaffili...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion | |Journal=Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=115–156 |
| − | |URL=www.gespraechsforschung- | + | |URL=http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2019/ga-kuettner.pdf |
| − | |Abstract=This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks | + | |Abstract=This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms underlying this practice, the paper also takes stock of the various (and partly variable) lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct that recurrently enter into its composition. Since the practice essentially rests on the speaker’s insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its relationship to the organization of repair will also be discussed. It is argued that the practice operates precisely at the intersection of stance-management (agreement/disagreement) and repair, and that it exhibits features which reflect this intersectional character. Data are in English. |
| − | at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated | ||
| − | ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. | ||
| − | Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used | ||
| − | as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often | ||
| − | resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms | ||
| − | |||
| − | lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct | ||
| − | |||
| − | speaker’s insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its | ||
| − | |||
| − | practice operates | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:58, 19 January 2020
| Kuettner2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kuettner2019 |
| Author(s) | Uwe-A. Küttner |
| Title | At the intersection of stance-management and repair: Meta-pragmatic claims as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, meta-talk, (dis)affiliation, (dis)agreement, stance, repair, Conversation Analysis |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion |
| Volume | 20 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 115–156 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article offers an in-depth analysis of one particular type of meta-talk. It looks at how speakers use the meta-pragmatic claim to have previously communicated ('said' or 'meant') the same as, or the equivalent of, what their interlocutor just said. Through detailed sequential analyses, it is shown that this claim is frequently used as a practice for disarming disaffiliative responses and thus to manage (and often resolve) incipient disagreement. Besides unpacking the precise mechanisms underlying this practice, the paper also takes stock of the various (and partly variable) lexico-morpho-syntactic, prosodic and bodily-visual elements of conduct that recurrently enter into its composition. Since the practice essentially rests on the speaker’s insinuation of having been misunderstood by their co-participant, its relationship to the organization of repair will also be discussed. It is argued that the practice operates precisely at the intersection of stance-management (agreement/disagreement) and repair, and that it exhibits features which reflect this intersectional character. Data are in English.
Notes
