Difference between revisions of "Hudak-Clark-Raymond2013"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Pamela Hudak; Shannon Clark; Geoffrey Raymond |Title=Some interactional consequences of medical specialization: The omni-relevance of su...")
 
m
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=28
 
|Volume=28
 
|Number=6
 
|Number=6
|Pages=533-545
+
|Pages=533–545
 +
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10410236.2012.702642
 +
|DOI=10.1080/10410236.2012.702642
 +
|Abstract=This article examines treatment recommendations in orthopedic surgery consultations and shows how surgery is treated as “omni-relevant” within this activity, providing a context within which the broad range of treatment recommendations proposed by surgeons is offered. Using conversation analysis to analyse audiotaped encounters between orthopedic surgeons and patients, we highlight how surgeons treat surgery as having a special, privileged status relative to other treatment options by (1) invoking surgery (whether or not it is actually being recommended) and (2) presenting surgery as the “last best resort” (in relation to which other treatment options are calibrated, described and considered). This privileged status surfaces in the design and delivery of recommendations as a clear asymmetry: Recommendations for surgery are proposed early, in relatively simple and unmitigated form. In contrast, recommendations not for surgery tend to be delayed and involve significantly more interactional work in their delivery. Possible implications of these findings, including how surgeons' structuring of recommendations may shape patient expectations (whether for surgery or some alternative), and potentially influence the distribution of orthopedic surgery procedures arising from these consultations, are considered.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 14:31, 2 March 2016

Hudak-Clark-Raymond2013
BibType ARTICLE
Key Hudak-Clark-Raymond2013
Author(s) Pamela Hudak, Shannon Clark, Geoffrey Raymond
Title Some interactional consequences of medical specialization: The omni-relevance of surgery in treatment recommendations by orthopaedic surgeons
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, Medical consultations
Publisher
Year 2013
Language
City
Month
Journal Health Communication
Volume 28
Number 6
Pages 533–545
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/10410236.2012.702642
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article examines treatment recommendations in orthopedic surgery consultations and shows how surgery is treated as “omni-relevant” within this activity, providing a context within which the broad range of treatment recommendations proposed by surgeons is offered. Using conversation analysis to analyse audiotaped encounters between orthopedic surgeons and patients, we highlight how surgeons treat surgery as having a special, privileged status relative to other treatment options by (1) invoking surgery (whether or not it is actually being recommended) and (2) presenting surgery as the “last best resort” (in relation to which other treatment options are calibrated, described and considered). This privileged status surfaces in the design and delivery of recommendations as a clear asymmetry: Recommendations for surgery are proposed early, in relatively simple and unmitigated form. In contrast, recommendations not for surgery tend to be delayed and involve significantly more interactional work in their delivery. Possible implications of these findings, including how surgeons' structuring of recommendations may shape patient expectations (whether for surgery or some alternative), and potentially influence the distribution of orthopedic surgery procedures arising from these consultations, are considered.

Notes