Difference between revisions of "Hoey2021"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Paul Hömke; Emma Löfgren; Tayo Neumann; William L. Schuerman; Kobin H. Kendrick |Title=Using expletive insertion to p...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Paul Hömke; Emma Löfgren; Tayo Neumann; William L. Schuerman; Kobin H. Kendrick | |Author(s)=Elliott M. Hoey; Paul Hömke; Emma Löfgren; Tayo Neumann; William L. Schuerman; Kobin H. Kendrick | ||
|Title=Using expletive insertion to pursue and sanction in interaction | |Title=Using expletive insertion to pursue and sanction in interaction | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Swearing; Pursuit; Sanctioning; Taboo language; Cursing; Upgrading; Escalation | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Swearing; Pursuit; Sanctioning; Taboo language; Cursing; Upgrading; Escalation |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Hoey2021 |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2021 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Journal of Sociolinguistics | |Journal=Journal of Sociolinguistics | ||
| + | |Volume=25 | ||
| + | |Number=1 | ||
| + | |Pages=3–25 | ||
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/josl.12439 | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/josl.12439 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1111/josl.12439 |
|Abstract=This article uses conversation analysis to examine constructions like who the fuck is that—sequence‐initiating actions into which an expletive like the fuck has been inserted. We describe how this turn‐constructional practice fits into and constitutes a recurrent sequence of escalating actions. In this sequence, it is used to pursue an adequate response after an inadequate one was given, and sanction the recipient for that inadequate response. Our analysis contributes to sociolinguistic studies of swearing by offering an account of swearing as a resource for social action. | |Abstract=This article uses conversation analysis to examine constructions like who the fuck is that—sequence‐initiating actions into which an expletive like the fuck has been inserted. We describe how this turn‐constructional practice fits into and constitutes a recurrent sequence of escalating actions. In this sequence, it is used to pursue an adequate response after an inadequate one was given, and sanction the recipient for that inadequate response. Our analysis contributes to sociolinguistic studies of swearing by offering an account of swearing as a resource for social action. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:46, 15 March 2021
| Hoey2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Hoey2021 |
| Author(s) | Elliott M. Hoey, Paul Hömke, Emma Löfgren, Tayo Neumann, William L. Schuerman, Kobin H. Kendrick |
| Title | Using expletive insertion to pursue and sanction in interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Swearing, Pursuit, Sanctioning, Taboo language, Cursing, Upgrading, Escalation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Journal of Sociolinguistics |
| Volume | 25 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 3–25 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/josl.12439 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article uses conversation analysis to examine constructions like who the fuck is that—sequence‐initiating actions into which an expletive like the fuck has been inserted. We describe how this turn‐constructional practice fits into and constitutes a recurrent sequence of escalating actions. In this sequence, it is used to pursue an adequate response after an inadequate one was given, and sanction the recipient for that inadequate response. Our analysis contributes to sociolinguistic studies of swearing by offering an account of swearing as a resource for social action.
Notes
