Difference between revisions of "Heritage1994"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2015-07-21 03:59:11)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|Key=Heritage1994
+
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Key=Heritage1994
+
|Author(s)=John Heritage; Marja-Leena Sorjonen;
 
|Title=Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design
 
|Title=Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design
|Author(s)=John Heritage; Marja-Leena Sorjonen;
 
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; conversation analysis; institutional interaction; turn design
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical EMCA; conversation analysis; institutional interaction; turn design
|BibType=ARTICLE
+
|Key=Heritage1994
 
|Year=1994
 
|Year=1994
 
|Journal=Language in Society
 
|Journal=Language in Society
 
|Volume=23
 
|Volume=23
 
|Pages=1–29
 
|Pages=1–29
 +
|URL= http://www.jstor.org/stable/4168492
 
|Abstract=The role of the connective and is here considered as a preface to questions in spoken interaction. Using data from informal medical encounters, it is argued that and-prefacing is used to link a question to a preceding question/answer pair or pairs. In such contexts, and-prefacing indicates that the questions it prefaces have a routine or agenda-based character. This in turn can be a resource which invokes and sustains an orienta- tion to an activity or course of action that is implemented through a series of question/answer pairs, but transcends any individual pair. The general characteristics of and-prefaced questions are contrasted with contingent or follow-up questions, which are not normally and- prefaced. Some strategic uses of and-prefaced questions are described, and the role of the device within the more general sociolinguistic con- text of the data is discussed.
 
|Abstract=The role of the connective and is here considered as a preface to questions in spoken interaction. Using data from informal medical encounters, it is argued that and-prefacing is used to link a question to a preceding question/answer pair or pairs. In such contexts, and-prefacing indicates that the questions it prefaces have a routine or agenda-based character. This in turn can be a resource which invokes and sustains an orienta- tion to an activity or course of action that is implemented through a series of question/answer pairs, but transcends any individual pair. The general characteristics of and-prefaced questions are contrasted with contingent or follow-up questions, which are not normally and- prefaced. Some strategic uses of and-prefaced questions are described, and the role of the device within the more general sociolinguistic con- text of the data is discussed.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 08:00, 21 July 2015

Heritage1994
BibType ARTICLE
Key Heritage1994
Author(s) John Heritage, Marja-Leena Sorjonen
Title Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Medical EMCA, conversation analysis, institutional interaction, turn design
Publisher
Year 1994
Language
City
Month
Journal Language in Society
Volume 23
Number
Pages 1–29
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The role of the connective and is here considered as a preface to questions in spoken interaction. Using data from informal medical encounters, it is argued that and-prefacing is used to link a question to a preceding question/answer pair or pairs. In such contexts, and-prefacing indicates that the questions it prefaces have a routine or agenda-based character. This in turn can be a resource which invokes and sustains an orienta- tion to an activity or course of action that is implemented through a series of question/answer pairs, but transcends any individual pair. The general characteristics of and-prefaced questions are contrasted with contingent or follow-up questions, which are not normally and- prefaced. Some strategic uses of and-prefaced questions are described, and the role of the device within the more general sociolinguistic con- text of the data is discussed.

Notes