Ferrie2004
Revision as of 05:57, 16 October 2017 by Clair-AntoineVeyrier (talk | contribs)
| Ferrie2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Ferrie2004 |
| Author(s) | Jean-Noël Ferrié, Baudouin Dupret |
| Title | Préférences et Pertinences: Analyse Praxéologique des Figures du Compromis en Contexte Parlementaire. A Propos D'un Débat Égyptien |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | compromise, ethnomethodology, hearings, parliament, Egypt |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | French |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Science Information |
| Volume | 43 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 263–290 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0539018404042582 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Taking as its departure point an Egyptian parliamentary debate, this article shows, first of all, that rational-choice theory cannot describe the making of a compromise; and, second, that the re-appraisal of preferences does not imply a change of opinion after the debate. It argues instead that the praxeological approach is more suitable for describing this dynamic.
Notes
