Difference between revisions of "Eskildsen-Markee2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Søren W. Eskildsen; Numa Markee |Title=L2 talk as social accomplishment |Editor(s)=Rosa Alonso Alonso |Tag(s)=EMCA; L2; Second lan...")
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=L2 talk as social accomplishment
 
|Title=L2 talk as social accomplishment
 
|Editor(s)=Rosa Alonso Alonso
 
|Editor(s)=Rosa Alonso Alonso
|Tag(s)=EMCA; L2; Second language acquisition;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; L2; Second language acquisition;
 
|Key=Eskildsen-Markee2018
 
|Key=Eskildsen-Markee2018
 +
|Publisher=John Benjamins
 
|Year=2018
 
|Year=2018
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 +
|Address=Amsterdam
 
|Booktitle=Speaking in a Second Language
 
|Booktitle=Speaking in a Second Language
|Pages=69-103
+
|Pages=69–103
 
|URL=https://benjamins.com/#catalog/books/aals.17.04esk/details
 
|URL=https://benjamins.com/#catalog/books/aals.17.04esk/details
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.17.04esk
+
|DOI=10.1075/aals.17.04esk
 
|Abstract=This position paper builds on ethnomethodological conversation analysis to make a number of interrelated, empirically derived claims about speaking a second language and learning to do it as a social endeavor. We will show that: (1) language is primarily action, that linguistic units are primarily designed and used for and learned as actions in situ; (2) language is occasioned and environmentally contingent, and speaking is turn-taking that presupposes an ability to monitor other people’s talk; and (3) language, learning and cognition are socially distributed, co-constructed, embodied and embedded in local situations. They are each other’s ongoing continuations or extensions, made visible by verbal and bodily behavior. They rely on other people’s actions in situ as language is co-constructed and language-as-action emerges.
 
|Abstract=This position paper builds on ethnomethodological conversation analysis to make a number of interrelated, empirically derived claims about speaking a second language and learning to do it as a social endeavor. We will show that: (1) language is primarily action, that linguistic units are primarily designed and used for and learned as actions in situ; (2) language is occasioned and environmentally contingent, and speaking is turn-taking that presupposes an ability to monitor other people’s talk; and (3) language, learning and cognition are socially distributed, co-constructed, embodied and embedded in local situations. They are each other’s ongoing continuations or extensions, made visible by verbal and bodily behavior. They rely on other people’s actions in situ as language is co-constructed and language-as-action emerges.
 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 01:58, 14 January 2020

Eskildsen-Markee2018
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Eskildsen-Markee2018
Author(s) Søren W. Eskildsen, Numa Markee
Title L2 talk as social accomplishment
Editor(s) Rosa Alonso Alonso
Tag(s) EMCA, L2, Second language acquisition
Publisher John Benjamins
Year 2018
Language English
City Amsterdam
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 69–103
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/aals.17.04esk
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Speaking in a Second Language
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This position paper builds on ethnomethodological conversation analysis to make a number of interrelated, empirically derived claims about speaking a second language and learning to do it as a social endeavor. We will show that: (1) language is primarily action, that linguistic units are primarily designed and used for and learned as actions in situ; (2) language is occasioned and environmentally contingent, and speaking is turn-taking that presupposes an ability to monitor other people’s talk; and (3) language, learning and cognition are socially distributed, co-constructed, embodied and embedded in local situations. They are each other’s ongoing continuations or extensions, made visible by verbal and bodily behavior. They rely on other people’s actions in situ as language is co-constructed and language-as-action emerges.

Notes