Enfield2014

From emcawiki
Revision as of 10:08, 17 December 2014 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Nick J. Enfield; |Title=Human agency and the infrastructure for requests |Editor(s)=Paul Drew; Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen; |Tag(s)=E...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Enfield2014
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Enfield2014
Author(s) Nick J. Enfield
Title Human agency and the infrastructure for requests
Editor(s) Paul Drew, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Tag(s) EMCA, Recruitments, Requests, Lao
Publisher John Benjamins Publishing Company
Year 2014
Language
City
Month
Journal
Volume
Number 26
Pages 35-54
URL
DOI 10.1075/slsi.26.02enf
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series Studies in Language and Social Interaction
Howpublished
Book title Requesting in Social Interaction
Chapter 2

Download BibTex

Abstract

This chapter discusses some of the elements of human sociality that serve as the social and cognitive infrastructure or preconditions for the use of requests and other kinds of recruitments in interaction. The notion of an agent with goals is a canonical starting point, though importantly agency tends not to be wholly located in individuals, but rather is socially distributed. This is well illustrated in the case of requests, in which the person or group that has a certain goal is not necessarily the one who carries out the behavior towards that goal. The chapter focuses on the role of semiotic (mostly linguistic) resources in negotiating the distribution of agency with request-like actions, with examples from video-recorded interaction in Lao, a language spoken in Laos and nearby countries. The examples illustrate five hallmarks of requesting in human interaction, which show some ways in which our ‘manipulation’ of other people is quite unlike our manipulation of tools: (1) that even though B is being manipulated, B wants to help, (2) that while A is manipulating B now, A may be manipulated in return later; (3) that the goal of the behavior may be shared between A and B, (4) that B may not comply, or may comply differently than requested, due to actual or potential contingencies, and (5) that A and B are accountable to one another; reasons may be asked for, and/or given, for the request. These hallmarks of requesting are grounded in a prosocial framework of human agency.

Notes