Difference between revisions of "Edmonds-Weatherall2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=David Matthew Edmonds; Ann Weatherall; |Title=Managing verbal and embodied conduct in telephone-mediated service encounters |Editor(s)=P...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
+
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|Author(s)=David Matthew Edmonds; Ann Weatherall;
 
|Author(s)=David Matthew Edmonds; Ann Weatherall;
 
|Title=Managing verbal and embodied conduct in telephone-mediated service encounters
 
|Title=Managing verbal and embodied conduct in telephone-mediated service encounters
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Telephone-mediated interaction; Closings; Embodied conduct; Multiactivity
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Telephone-mediated interaction; Closings; Embodied conduct; Multiactivity
 
|Key=Edmonds-Weatherall2019
 
|Key=Edmonds-Weatherall2019
 +
|Publisher=John Benjamins
 
|Year=2019
 
|Year=2019
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 +
|Address=Amsterdam
 
|Booktitle=Technology Mediated Service Encounters
 
|Booktitle=Technology Mediated Service Encounters
|Pages=71-96
+
|Pages=71–96
 
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.300.03mat
 
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.300.03mat
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.300.03mat
+
|DOI=10.1075/pbns.300.03mat
 
|Abstract=In telephone-mediated service encounters, there are limits on how parties interact with one another. Speakers are restricted to only verbal (what they say) and aural (what they hear) means of communication. Therefore, a practical problem at the heart of such interactions is how speakers manage embodied conduct, given that they can only hear – rather than see the other person. We investigated how verbal and embodied conduct were managed in a corpus of 63 calls to a New Zealand helpline service where callers (complainants) interact with conciliators (institutional representatives) to complain about, and attempt to resolve disputes with their electricity and gas providers. Using conversation analysis, we document two ways that callers could manage verbal and embodied conduct in a particular type of sequence in these calls.
 
|Abstract=In telephone-mediated service encounters, there are limits on how parties interact with one another. Speakers are restricted to only verbal (what they say) and aural (what they hear) means of communication. Therefore, a practical problem at the heart of such interactions is how speakers manage embodied conduct, given that they can only hear – rather than see the other person. We investigated how verbal and embodied conduct were managed in a corpus of 63 calls to a New Zealand helpline service where callers (complainants) interact with conciliators (institutional representatives) to complain about, and attempt to resolve disputes with their electricity and gas providers. Using conversation analysis, we document two ways that callers could manage verbal and embodied conduct in a particular type of sequence in these calls.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:41, 19 January 2020

Edmonds-Weatherall2019
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Edmonds-Weatherall2019
Author(s) David Matthew Edmonds, Ann Weatherall
Title Managing verbal and embodied conduct in telephone-mediated service encounters
Editor(s) Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Lucía Fernández-Amaya, María de la O Hernández-López
Tag(s) EMCA, Telephone-mediated interaction, Closings, Embodied conduct, Multiactivity
Publisher John Benjamins
Year 2019
Language English
City Amsterdam
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 71–96
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/pbns.300.03mat
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Technology Mediated Service Encounters
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In telephone-mediated service encounters, there are limits on how parties interact with one another. Speakers are restricted to only verbal (what they say) and aural (what they hear) means of communication. Therefore, a practical problem at the heart of such interactions is how speakers manage embodied conduct, given that they can only hear – rather than see the other person. We investigated how verbal and embodied conduct were managed in a corpus of 63 calls to a New Zealand helpline service where callers (complainants) interact with conciliators (institutional representatives) to complain about, and attempt to resolve disputes with their electricity and gas providers. Using conversation analysis, we document two ways that callers could manage verbal and embodied conduct in a particular type of sequence in these calls.

Notes