Bregasi2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 07:17, 31 July 2019 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Majlinda Bregasi |Title=Saving Face and Atrocities: Sequence Expansions and Indirectness in Television Interviews |Tag(s)=EMCA; In press...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Bregasi2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Bregasi2019
Author(s) Majlinda Bregasi
Title Saving Face and Atrocities: Sequence Expansions and Indirectness in Television Interviews
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, In press, Adjacency pairs, Television interview, Interview, Sequential organisation, Thick description, Political discourse, Albanian
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Human Studies
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09519-1
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article addresses the conversational process taking place during a TV interview in which the contrast shows up between the canonical procedure overseeing the succession and nature of conversational roles and turn-takings in contemporary media contexts and the preservation of an atavistic attitude tied to a traditional culture, Albanian tradition of oda. The discourse in these chambers is a revered phenomenon in the Albanian culture. The interviewee uses the traditional code of oral communication in the oda as a strategy for saving his honour in public, while the interviewer uses another code, the language of investigative journalism. In this paper, a detailed analysis of this interview shows how the sequences built on a basic adjacency pair operate to allow the interviewee to attempt to save face in a compromising situation. We see how the oda structures override normal turn-taking rules and how the face-work process (Goffman Interaction ritual. Essays on the face-to-face behavior, Doubleday, New York, 1967) is reflected in expanded sequences. We consider this topic as an extension of a potential CA analysis when describing how cultural forms with different procedural rules affect general turn-taking.

Notes