Difference between revisions of "Blythe-etal2018"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Joe Blythe; Rod Gardner; Ilana Mushin; Lesley Stirling; |Title=Tools of Engagement: Selecting a Next Speaker in Australian Aboriginal M...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Joe Blythe; Rod Gardner; Ilana Mushin; | + | |Author(s)=Joe Blythe; Rod Gardner; Ilana Mushin; Lesley Stirling; |
| − | |Title=Tools of | + | |Title=Tools of engagement: selecting a next speaker in Australian Aboriginal multiparty conversations |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Responsiveness; Embodied behavior; Australia; Aboriginal | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Responsiveness; Embodied behavior; Australia; Aboriginal | ||
|Key=Blythe-etal2018 | |Key=Blythe-etal2018 | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| − | |Journal=Research on Language | + | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction |
|Volume=51 | |Volume=51 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=145–170 |
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441 |
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Building on earlier Conversation Analytic work on turn-taking and response | + | |Abstract=Building on earlier Conversation Analytic work on turn-taking and response mobilization, we use video-recorded multiparty conversations to consider in detail how Australian Aboriginal participants in conversation select a next speaker in turns that are grammatically designed as questions. We focus in particular on the role of a range of embodied behaviors, such as gaze direction, body orientation, and pointing, to select—or avoid selecting—a next speaker. We use data from four remote Aboriginal communities to also explore the claims from ethnographic research that Aboriginal conversations typically occur in nonfocused participation frames. Data are in Murrinhpatha, Garrwa, Gija, and Jaru with English translations. |
| − | mobilization, we use video-recorded multiparty conversations to consider in | ||
| − | detail how Australian Aboriginal participants in conversation select a next | ||
| − | speaker in turns that are grammatically designed as questions. We focus in | ||
| − | particular on the role of a range of embodied behaviors, such as gaze | ||
| − | direction, body orientation, and pointing, to select—or avoid selecting—a | ||
| − | next speaker. We use data from four remote Aboriginal communities to also | ||
| − | explore the claims from ethnographic research that Aboriginal | ||
| − | |||
| − | Murrinhpatha, Garrwa, Gija, and Jaru with English translations. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:38, 14 January 2020
| Blythe-etal2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Blythe-etal2018 |
| Author(s) | Joe Blythe, Rod Gardner, Ilana Mushin, Lesley Stirling |
| Title | Tools of engagement: selecting a next speaker in Australian Aboriginal multiparty conversations |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Responsiveness, Embodied behavior, Australia, Aboriginal |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 51 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 145–170 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2018.1449441 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Building on earlier Conversation Analytic work on turn-taking and response mobilization, we use video-recorded multiparty conversations to consider in detail how Australian Aboriginal participants in conversation select a next speaker in turns that are grammatically designed as questions. We focus in particular on the role of a range of embodied behaviors, such as gaze direction, body orientation, and pointing, to select—or avoid selecting—a next speaker. We use data from four remote Aboriginal communities to also explore the claims from ethnographic research that Aboriginal conversations typically occur in nonfocused participation frames. Data are in Murrinhpatha, Garrwa, Gija, and Jaru with English translations.
Notes
