Difference between revisions of "Muller2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Sophie Merit Müller |Title=Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Reflexivity in Ethnography |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnography;...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 07:52, 21 August 2016
| Muller2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Muller2016 |
| Author(s) | Sophie Merit Müller |
| Title | Becoming the Phenomenon? An Alternative Approach to Reflexivity in Ethnography |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnography, Ethnomethodology, Reflexivity, Practice, Body, Ballet, In Press |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Inquiry |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1077800416660580 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article presents a praxeologically informed approach to “transgressing the researcher-subject” in ethnography. I unfurl a concept of “strong” reflexivity as developing a perspective of unfamiliarity toward one’s own practices and beliefs. By drawing on my study on practicing ballet, I illustrate how I dealt with my own bodily involvement as a professional dance student. Comparing my approach with evocative autoethnography, I not only emphasize that corporeal sensitivity and alertness are inherent to both styles of inquiry. Yet, I also point out their differences. Whereas evocative autoethnography takes subjectivity as a resource for insights, this approach uses it as an instrument for discovery.
Notes
