Difference between revisions of "VomLehn2023c"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Dirk vom Lehn; Margarethe Kusenbach |Title=Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of 'Communicative Constructivism'...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of 'Communicative Constructivism' | |Title=Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of 'Communicative Constructivism' | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Communicative constructivism; Constructionism; Ethnography; Ethnomethodology; Focused ethnography; Symbolic interactionism; Interactionism; Videography | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Communicative constructivism; Constructionism; Ethnography; Ethnomethodology; Focused ethnography; Symbolic interactionism; Interactionism; Videography | ||
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=vomLehn2023c |
|Year=2023 | |Year=2023 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
Latest revision as of 07:13, 8 December 2023
| VomLehn2023c | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | vomLehn2023c |
| Author(s) | Dirk vom Lehn, Margarethe Kusenbach |
| Title | Challenges and Opportunities in the International Reception of 'Communicative Constructivism' |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Communicative constructivism, Constructionism, Ethnography, Ethnomethodology, Focused ethnography, Symbolic interactionism, Interactionism, Videography |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2023 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Volume | 24 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | Art. 15 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.17169/fqs-24.3.4064 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this article, we offer some observations on the international standing of communicative constructivism (CoCo), as discussed in scholarship published largely in German over the past decade (e.g., KELLER, KOBLAUCH & REICHERTZ, 2013; KNOBLAUCH, 2019a [2016]; REICHERTZ, 2009). We seek to explain why, in our view, CoCo has not thus far had a noticeable influence on academic discourse in international, particularly Anglo-American, sociology. Amongst others, we highlight issues regarding the name that was picked for the perspective and regarding the literal translation of German CoCo terminology into the English language. We also point to some theoretical and methodological choices that have made it difficult to link CoCo to interactionist sociology in general, and to ethnomethodology and ethnography in particular, i.e., perspectives that we are closely aligned with. We conclude with a summary of our observations and a few suggested steps communicative constructivists might consider taking to broaden and diversify the appeal of their program beyond German speaking sociology.
Notes
