Difference between revisions of "Kendrick-Holler2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; Judith Holler; |Title=Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze; Response; Prefer...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; Judith Holler; | |Author(s)=Kobin H. Kendrick; Judith Holler; | ||
|Title=Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation | |Title=Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze; Response; Preference; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze; Response; Preference; |
|Key=Kendrick-Holler2017 | |Key=Kendrick-Holler2017 | ||
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=50 | |Volume=50 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=12-32 | |Pages=12-32 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120 | ||
| − | |Abstract=In this article, we examine gaze direction in responses to polar questions | + | |Abstract=In this article, we examine gaze direction in responses to polar questions using both quantitative and conversation analytic (CA) methods. The data come from a novel corpus of conversations in which participants wore eye-tracking glasses to obtain direct measures of their eye movements. The results show that while most preferred responses are produced with gaze toward the questioner, most dispreferred responses are produced with gaze aversion. We further demonstrate that gaze aversion by respondents can occasion self-repair by questioners in the transition space between turns, indicating that the relationship between gaze direction and preference is more than a mere statistical association. We conclude that gaze direction in responses to polar questions functions as a signal of response preference. Data are in American, British, and Canadian English. |
| − | using both quantitative and conversation analytic (CA) methods. The data | ||
| − | come from a novel corpus of conversations in which participants wore eye- | ||
| − | tracking glasses to obtain direct measures of their eye movements. The | ||
| − | results show that while most preferred responses are produced with gaze | ||
| − | toward the questioner, most dispreferred responses are produced with gaze | ||
| − | aversion. We further demonstrate that gaze aversion by respondents can | ||
| − | occasion self-repair by questioners in the transition space between turns, | ||
| − | indicating that the relationship between gaze direction and preference is | ||
| − | more than a mere statistical association. We conclude that gaze direction in | ||
| − | responses to polar questions functions as a signal of response preference. | ||
| − | Data are in American, British, and Canadian English. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:30, 13 September 2023
| Kendrick-Holler2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kendrick-Holler2017 |
| Author(s) | Kobin H. Kendrick, Judith Holler |
| Title | Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Gaze, Response, Preference |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 12-32 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this article, we examine gaze direction in responses to polar questions using both quantitative and conversation analytic (CA) methods. The data come from a novel corpus of conversations in which participants wore eye-tracking glasses to obtain direct measures of their eye movements. The results show that while most preferred responses are produced with gaze toward the questioner, most dispreferred responses are produced with gaze aversion. We further demonstrate that gaze aversion by respondents can occasion self-repair by questioners in the transition space between turns, indicating that the relationship between gaze direction and preference is more than a mere statistical association. We conclude that gaze direction in responses to polar questions functions as a signal of response preference. Data are in American, British, and Canadian English.
Notes
