Difference between revisions of "MeierzuVerl2024"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christian Meier zu Verl; Christian Meyer; |Title=Ethnomethodological ethnography: Historical, conceptual, and methodological foundations...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Qualitative Research | |Journal=Qualitative Research | ||
| − | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14687941221129798 |
|DOI=10.1177/14687941221129798 | |DOI=10.1177/14687941221129798 | ||
|Abstract=This text discusses the relationship between ethnomethodology and ethnography and sketches what can be called an ethnomethodological ethnography. To do so, it shows that Garfinkel and his collaborators work ethnographically in order to adequately describe social phenomena and make their phenomenal field properties noticeable. To highlight the distinctive features of ethnomethodological ethnography, the text first discusses other ethnographic approaches. Differences between these approaches and the ethnomethodological ethnography become apparent through two argumentative steps: first, by discussing Garfinkel’s reflections on ethnomethodology and ethnography, and second, by discussing actual ethnographies by Garfinkel's collaborators. The text concludes with a general reflection on the methodological principles of ethnomethodological ethnography. | |Abstract=This text discusses the relationship between ethnomethodology and ethnography and sketches what can be called an ethnomethodological ethnography. To do so, it shows that Garfinkel and his collaborators work ethnographically in order to adequately describe social phenomena and make their phenomenal field properties noticeable. To highlight the distinctive features of ethnomethodological ethnography, the text first discusses other ethnographic approaches. Differences between these approaches and the ethnomethodological ethnography become apparent through two argumentative steps: first, by discussing Garfinkel’s reflections on ethnomethodology and ethnography, and second, by discussing actual ethnographies by Garfinkel's collaborators. The text concludes with a general reflection on the methodological principles of ethnomethodological ethnography. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:02, 19 December 2022
| MeierzuVerl2024 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | MeierzuVerl2022 |
| Author(s) | Christian Meier zu Verl, Christian Meyer |
| Title | Ethnomethodological ethnography: Historical, conceptual, and methodological foundations |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, In press, Ethnomethodology, Ethnography, Crisis of representation, Harold Garfinkel, Methodology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Research |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/14687941221129798 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This text discusses the relationship between ethnomethodology and ethnography and sketches what can be called an ethnomethodological ethnography. To do so, it shows that Garfinkel and his collaborators work ethnographically in order to adequately describe social phenomena and make their phenomenal field properties noticeable. To highlight the distinctive features of ethnomethodological ethnography, the text first discusses other ethnographic approaches. Differences between these approaches and the ethnomethodological ethnography become apparent through two argumentative steps: first, by discussing Garfinkel’s reflections on ethnomethodology and ethnography, and second, by discussing actual ethnographies by Garfinkel's collaborators. The text concludes with a general reflection on the methodological principles of ethnomethodological ethnography.
Notes
