Difference between revisions of "Barske2006"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=PHDTHESIS |Author(s)=Tobias Barske; |Title=CO-CONSTRUCTING SOCIAL ROLES IN GERMAN BUSINESS MEETINGS: A CONVERSATION ANALYTIC STUDY |Tag(s)=EMCA; Business m...") |
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=PHDTHESIS | |BibType=PHDTHESIS | ||
|Author(s)=Tobias Barske; | |Author(s)=Tobias Barske; | ||
− | |Title= | + | |Title=Co-constructing Social Roles In German Business Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Business meeting; German | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Business meeting; German | ||
|Key=Barske2006 | |Key=Barske2006 |
Latest revision as of 05:50, 13 April 2020
Barske2006 | |
---|---|
BibType | PHDTHESIS |
Key | Barske2006 |
Author(s) | Tobias Barske |
Title | Co-constructing Social Roles In German Business Meetings: A Conversation Analytic Study |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Business meeting, German |
Publisher | |
Year | 2006 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
In Chapter 1, I situate this dissertation within existing studies on business meetings and introduce the research methodology of conversation analysis. Chapter 2 examines all uses of the particle ok in German business meetings. In my presentation of the first description of ok in a language other than English, I argue that certain uses of ok relate to enacting the social role of ‘doing-being-boss.’ Furthermore, Chapter 3 examines the practice of how employees produce extended reports about ongoing projects. In discussing the social role of ‘doing-being-employee,’ I compare the practice of story-telling in ordinary conversation to that of producing reports during German business meetings. Specifically, I describe how speakers orient to a systematic use of intonation patterns to enable correct and complete reports. Moreover, Chapter 4 problematizes the notion of pre-assigned social roles. Using the concept of zones of interactional transition, I discuss instances where employees question the role of meeting facilitator, chairperson, and boss. In analyzing the interactional fallout in these examples, I offer additional evidence that social roles such as boss represent a social construct which depends on a constant co-construction of this role. Finally, in the conclusion I situate my findings within the field of institutional talk.
Notes