Difference between revisions of "Maynard1996"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard;
 
|Author(s)=Douglas W. Maynard;
|Title=On "realization" in everyday life: The forecasting of bad news as a social relation
+
|Title=On “realization” in everyday life: the forecasting of bad news as a social relation
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Medical EMCA; News; Forecasting
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Narratives; Medical EMCA; News; Forecasting
 
|Key=Maynard1996
 
|Key=Maynard1996
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Journal=American Sociological Review
 
|Journal=American Sociological Review
 
|Volume=61
 
|Volume=61
|Pages=109-131
+
|Number=1
 +
|Pages=109–131
 
|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096409
 
|URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096409
|Abstract=Forecasting is a strategy for delivering bad news and is compared to two  
+
|DOI=10.2307/2096409
other strategies, stalling and being blunt. Forecasting provides some warn-
+
|Abstract=Forecasting is a strategy for delivering bad news and is compared to two other strategies, stalling and being blunt. Forecasting provides some warning that bad news is forthcoming without keeping the recipient in a state of indefinite suspense (stalling) or conveying the news abruptly (being blunt). Forecasting appears to be more effective than stalling or being blunt in helping a recipient to "realize" the bad news because it involves the deliverer and recipient in a particular social relation: The deliverer of bad news initiates the telling by giving an advance indication of the bad news to come; this allows the recipient to calculate the news in advance of its final presentation, when the deliverer confirms what the recipient has been led to anticipate. Thus, realization of bad news emerges from intimate collaboration, whereas stalling and being blunt require recipients to apprehend the news in a social vacuum. Exacerbating disruption to recipients' everyday world, stalling and being blunt increase the probability of misapprehension (denying, blaming, taking the situation as a joke, etc.) and thereby inhibit rather than facilitate realization. Realization and lack thereof are features of social psychology; social practices and interactional organization are implicated in individual cognition. My data include more than 100 narratives about the delivery and receipt of bad news.
ing that bad news is forthcoming without keeping the recipient in a state of  
 
indefinite suspense (stalling) or conveying the news abruptly (being blunt).  
 
Forecasting appears to be more effective than stalling or being blunt in help-
 
ing a recipient to "realize" the bad news because it involves the deliverer  
 
and recipient in a particular social relation: The deliverer of bad news ini-
 
tiates the telling by giving an advance indication of the bad news to come;  
 
this allows the recipient to calculate the news in advance of its final presen-
 
tation, when the deliverer confirms what the recipient has been led to antici-
 
pate. Thus, realization of bad news emerges from intimate collaboration,  
 
whereas stalling and being blunt require recipients to apprehend the news in  
 
a social vacuum. Exacerbating disruption to recipients' everyday world,  
 
stalling and being blunt increase the probability of misapprehension (deny-
 
ing, blaming, taking the situation as a joke, etc.) and thereby inhibit rather  
 
than facilitate realization. Realization and lack thereof are features of social  
 
psychology; social practices and interactional organization are implicated  
 
in individual cognition. My data include more than 100 narratives about the  
 
delivery and receipt of bad news.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 13:10, 24 October 2019

Maynard1996
BibType ARTICLE
Key Maynard1996
Author(s) Douglas W. Maynard
Title On “realization” in everyday life: the forecasting of bad news as a social relation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Narratives, Medical EMCA, News, Forecasting
Publisher
Year 1996
Language
City
Month
Journal American Sociological Review
Volume 61
Number 1
Pages 109–131
URL Link
DOI 10.2307/2096409
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Forecasting is a strategy for delivering bad news and is compared to two other strategies, stalling and being blunt. Forecasting provides some warning that bad news is forthcoming without keeping the recipient in a state of indefinite suspense (stalling) or conveying the news abruptly (being blunt). Forecasting appears to be more effective than stalling or being blunt in helping a recipient to "realize" the bad news because it involves the deliverer and recipient in a particular social relation: The deliverer of bad news initiates the telling by giving an advance indication of the bad news to come; this allows the recipient to calculate the news in advance of its final presentation, when the deliverer confirms what the recipient has been led to anticipate. Thus, realization of bad news emerges from intimate collaboration, whereas stalling and being blunt require recipients to apprehend the news in a social vacuum. Exacerbating disruption to recipients' everyday world, stalling and being blunt increase the probability of misapprehension (denying, blaming, taking the situation as a joke, etc.) and thereby inhibit rather than facilitate realization. Realization and lack thereof are features of social psychology; social practices and interactional organization are implicated in individual cognition. My data include more than 100 narratives about the delivery and receipt of bad news.

Notes