Difference between revisions of "FitzgeraldRintel2016"
m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Chapter=12 | |Chapter=12 | ||
− | |Booktitle=Discursive | + | |Address=London |
+ | |Booktitle=Discursive Psychology: Classic and Contemporary Issues | ||
|Pages=181–193 | |Pages=181–193 | ||
+ | |URL=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315863054-16/reorienting-categories-members-phenomena-richard-fitzgerald-sean-rintel | ||
+ | |DOI=10.4324/9781315863054-16 | ||
|ISBN=978-0-415-72160-8 | |ISBN=978-0-415-72160-8 | ||
− | |Abstract=Edwards' | + | |Abstract=The chapter considers how MacMillan and Edwards' generally applicable discourse analytic approach cut into descriptions of Diana's death. It shows how 'generally applicable' the method is, applying it to a very different empirical context, and via a comparison with critical discourse analysis. It then considers the added value that Discursive Psychology (DP) can bring to the project of a textually oriented media studies. The chapter shows how it was possible to read, 'Who killed the princess' (WKP) as an early attempt to show that a DP inspired analytic approach could underpin a discursively oriented media studies. In order to show how 'generally applicable' WKP's discourse analytic method really is, the chapter explains a case study in which people see third-party recontextualisations at work in a very different setting, and similarly consequential, rhetorical work. The case study focuses on an incident of sexism in the English Premier League involving Andy Gray and Richard Keys, a well known football punditry team. |
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 03:27, 30 September 2023
FitzgeraldRintel2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | FitzgeraldRintel2016 |
Author(s) | Richard Fitzgerald, Sean Rintel |
Title | Reorienting categories as a members' phenomena |
Editor(s) | Cristian Tileagă, Elizabeth Stokoe |
Tag(s) | Discursive psychology, EMCA, membership categorisation analysis |
Publisher | Routledge |
Year | 2016 |
Language | English |
City | London |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 181–193 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.4324/9781315863054-16 |
ISBN | 978-0-415-72160-8 |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Discursive Psychology: Classic and Contemporary Issues |
Chapter | 12 |
Abstract
The chapter considers how MacMillan and Edwards' generally applicable discourse analytic approach cut into descriptions of Diana's death. It shows how 'generally applicable' the method is, applying it to a very different empirical context, and via a comparison with critical discourse analysis. It then considers the added value that Discursive Psychology (DP) can bring to the project of a textually oriented media studies. The chapter shows how it was possible to read, 'Who killed the princess' (WKP) as an early attempt to show that a DP inspired analytic approach could underpin a discursively oriented media studies. In order to show how 'generally applicable' WKP's discourse analytic method really is, the chapter explains a case study in which people see third-party recontextualisations at work in a very different setting, and similarly consequential, rhetorical work. The case study focuses on an incident of sexism in the English Premier League involving Andy Gray and Richard Keys, a well known football punditry team.
Notes