Difference between revisions of "DickersonRobinsDautenhahn2013"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Paul Dickerson; Ben Robins; Kerstin Dautenhahn
 
|Author(s)=Paul Dickerson; Ben Robins; Kerstin Dautenhahn
 
|Title=Where the action is: A conversation analytic perspective on interaction between a humanoid robot, a co-present adult and a child with an ASD
 
|Title=Where the action is: A conversation analytic perspective on interaction between a humanoid robot, a co-present adult and a child with an ASD
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Robots; ASD
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Robots; ASD; AI reference list
 
|Key=DickersonRobinsDautenhahn2013
 
|Key=DickersonRobinsDautenhahn2013
 
|Year=2013
 
|Year=2013
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.14.2.07dic
 
|URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/is.14.2.07dic
 
|DOI=10.1075/is.14.2.07dic
 
|DOI=10.1075/is.14.2.07dic
|Abstract=This paper examines interaction involving a child with an Autistic Spectrum Disorder, a humanoid robot and a co-present adult. In this paper data from one child (collected as part of the ROBOSKIN project) is analysed in order to evaluate the potential contributions of a conversation analytic perspective to the examination of data relating to socio-emotional reciprocity. The paper argues for the value of treating all interaction as potentially relevant, looking without carefully pre-defined target behaviours and examining behaviour within its specific sequence of interaction. Adopting this approach, the paper suggests, enables noticings and observations that might not be available from perspectives that rely on the coding of pre-specified behaviours in isolation. Treating all interaction as potentially relevant brought into view interactions that might otherwise be dismissed or ignored – because they occurred before, or after, the trial itself. Being informed by the value of unmotivated looking – rather than pre-specified coding schemes – enabled highly relevant behaviour that was not anticipated within the trials to be analysed. Finally, seeing sequence as important meant that behaviours were appreciated in their intricate detail, enabling a more precise understanding than might be available if they were considered separately from that sequential environment.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 00:46, 24 February 2021

DickersonRobinsDautenhahn2013
BibType ARTICLE
Key DickersonRobinsDautenhahn2013
Author(s) Paul Dickerson, Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn
Title Where the action is: A conversation analytic perspective on interaction between a humanoid robot, a co-present adult and a child with an ASD
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Robots, ASD, AI reference list
Publisher
Year 2013
Language
City
Month
Journal Interaction Studies
Volume 14
Number 2
Pages 297–316
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/is.14.2.07dic
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes