Difference between revisions of "Couper-Kuhlen2012"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
 
|Author(s)=Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
 
|Title=Turn continuation and clause combinations
 
|Title=Turn continuation and clause combinations
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Turn construction; Turn taking;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; Turn construction; Turn taking; Clause;
 
|Key=Couper-Kuhlen2012
 
|Key=Couper-Kuhlen2012
 
|Year=2012
 
|Year=2012
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Number=3-4
 
|Number=3-4
 
|Pages=273-299
 
|Pages=273-299
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853X.2012.664111#.VDGgY_ldWSo
+
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0163853X.2012.664111
 
|DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2012.664111
 
|DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2012.664111
|Abstract=This article explores the viability of the analytic distinction between “turn-con-
 
structional unit (TCU) continuation” (i.e., continuing a turn beyond a point of
 
possible completion with grammatically dependent material) and “new TCU”
 
(i.e., continuing a turn with grammatically independent material) when hypotactic
 
clause combinations are involved. The focus is on causal clause combinations,
 
which may be either lexico-syntactically marked (e.g., as in English with because)
 
or lexico-syntactically unmarked but prosodically cohesive. Based on data from
 
ordinary conversation, it is found that both marked and unmarked forms are used
 
in turn continuation, with the unit containing the account (the causal clause) being
 
delivered after the completion of a unit implementing the accountable action.
 
Both marked and unmarked forms of causal clause combination, when used in
 
turn continuation, allow for intervening talk after the accountable; both prioritize
 
the account in establishing relevancies for what happens next. Yet, in current
 
conceptualizations of turn continuation, they would be classified differently, with
 
marked forms counting as “TCU continuation” and unmarked forms as “new
 
TCU.” The implications of this unsatisfactory state of affairs are discussed in
 
the conclusion.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 05:13, 12 August 2020

Couper-Kuhlen2012
BibType ARTICLE
Key Couper-Kuhlen2012
Author(s) Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Title Turn continuation and clause combinations
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Interactional Linguistics, Turn construction, Turn taking, Clause
Publisher
Year 2012
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Processes
Volume 49
Number 3-4
Pages 273-299
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/0163853X.2012.664111
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes