Difference between revisions of "Burdelski2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Mattthew Burdelski;
 
|Author(s)=Mattthew Burdelski;
 
|Title=We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum
 
|Title=We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum
|Tag(s)=Conversation analysis; ethnic discrimination; guided tour; identity; Japanese American history; museum; narrative; positioning; stance; storytelling; World War II;  
+
|Tag(s)=Conversation analysis; ethnic discrimination; guided tour; identity; Japanese American history; museum; narrative; positioning; stance; storytelling; World War II;
 
|Key=Burdelski2016
 
|Key=Burdelski2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|DOI=10.1177/0957926515611553
 
|DOI=10.1177/0957926515611553
 
}}
 
}}
This article examines stories of personal experience of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum and analyzes the positioning practices deployed in constructing identity within the story world and storytelling. In particular, it shows how older Japanese American docents tell we-focused stories in positioning themselves as part of a group of Japanese Americans and family who were relocated and incarcerated during the war, and I-focused stories in positioning themselves as individuals who acted in response to unexpected events linked to relationships
+
This article examines stories of personal experience of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum and analyzes the positioning practices deployed in constructing identity within the story world and storytelling. In particular, it shows how older Japanese American docents tell we-focused stories in positioning themselves as part of a group of Japanese Americans and family who were relocated and incarcerated during the war, and I-focused stories in positioning themselves as individuals who acted in response to unexpected events linked to relationships and institutions. The analysis points out ways docents display stances toward past events and ways visitors participate in the telling such as by posing questions. It suggests that stories of personal experience are a vehicle for constructing identities that draw upon historical events,autobiographies, story structure, and interactional contingencies. The findings are related to stories as a tool of teaching and engaging museum visitors.
and institutions. The analysis points out ways docents display stances toward past events and ways visitors participate in the telling such as by posing questions. It suggests that stories of personal experience are a vehicle for constructing identities that draw upon historical events,autobiographies, story structure, and interactional contingencies. The findings are related to
 
stories as a tool of teaching and engaging museum visitors.
 

Revision as of 04:07, 30 June 2017

Burdelski2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Burdelski2016
Author(s) Mattthew Burdelski
Title We-focused and I-focused stories of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Conversation analysis, ethnic discrimination, guided tour, identity, Japanese American history, museum, narrative, positioning, stance, storytelling, World War II
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse & Society
Volume 27
Number 2
Pages 156-171
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/0957926515611553
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes


This article examines stories of personal experience of World War II in guided tours at a Japanese American museum and analyzes the positioning practices deployed in constructing identity within the story world and storytelling. In particular, it shows how older Japanese American docents tell we-focused stories in positioning themselves as part of a group of Japanese Americans and family who were relocated and incarcerated during the war, and I-focused stories in positioning themselves as individuals who acted in response to unexpected events linked to relationships and institutions. The analysis points out ways docents display stances toward past events and ways visitors participate in the telling such as by posing questions. It suggests that stories of personal experience are a vehicle for constructing identities that draw upon historical events,autobiographies, story structure, and interactional contingencies. The findings are related to stories as a tool of teaching and engaging museum visitors.