Deontic stance
| Encyclopedia of Terminology for CA and IL: Deontic stance | |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Melisa Stevanovic (Tampere University, Finland) (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0429-1672) |
| To cite: | Stevanovic, Melisa. (2023). Deontic stance. In Alexandra Gubina, Elliott M. Hoey & Chase Wesley Raymond (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Terminology for Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. International Society for Conversation Analysis (ISCA). DOI: [] |
Additional Related Entries:
Cited References:
Bolden, G. B. (2006). Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 661–688.
Clifton, J. (2019). Using conversation analysis for organisational research: A case study of leadership-in-action. Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), 342–357.
Ekberg, K., & LeCouteur, A. (2015). Clients’ resistance to therapists’ proposals: Managing epistemic and deontic status. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 12–25.
Henderson, G. (2020). Deontics at bedtime: A case study of participants’ resources in a directive trajectory involving a mother and her autistic child. Research on Children and Social Interaction, 4(2), 168–191.
Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). Membership categorization analysis: An introduction. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (pp. 1–23). University Press of America.
Ishino, M., & Okada, Y. (2018). Constructing students’ deontic status by use of alternative recognitionals for student reference. Classroom Discourse, 9(2), 95–111.
Jayyusi, L. (2014). Categorization and the Moral Order. Routledge.
Kecskes, I. (2010) The paradox of communication: a socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Society, 1(1), 50–73.
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 46–49.
Linton, R. (1936). The Study of Man. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Magnusson, S. (2020). Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings. Discourse & Communication, 14(6), 600–618.
Pomerantz, A. & Mandelbaum, J. (2005). Conversation analytic approaches to the relevance and uses of relationship categories in interaction. In K. L. Fitch & R. F. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 149–171). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric, and Social construction. Sage.
Psathas, G. (1999). Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies, 22(2), 139–162.
Roca-Cuberes, C. (2008). Membership categorization and professional insanity ascription. Discourse Studies, 10(4), 543–570.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–482.
Stevanovic, M. (2018). Social deontics: A nano-level approach to human power play. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(3), 369–389.
Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language in Society, 43(2), 185–207.
Stokoe, E. H. (2004). Gender and discourse, gender, and categorization: Current developments in language and gender research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(2), 107–129.
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. MIT Press.
Watson, D. R. (1978). Categorisation, authorisation and blame-negotiation in conversation. Sociology, 12(1), 105–113.
Watson, D. R. (1983). The presentation of a victim and motive in discourse: The case of police interrogations and interviews. Victimology, 8(1-2), 31-52.
Additional References:
