Beppu2017

From emcawiki
Revision as of 14:07, 18 June 2017 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Yuki Beppu |Title=Conversation Analysis of English Communication in a Multicultural Setting Class: How Students React and Debate |Tag(s)...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Beppu2017
BibType ARTICLE
Key Beppu2017
Author(s) Yuki Beppu
Title Conversation Analysis of English Communication in a Multicultural Setting Class: How Students React and Debate
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, EFL, Multicultural communication, Turn-taking
Publisher
Year 2017
Language
City
Month
Journal Bulletin of Tokyo University and Graduate School of Social Welfare
Volume 3
Number
Pages 125-141
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this study I compared difference of communication styles of Asian students and East European students in order

to guide students to be better communicators in English communication classrooms. It has been a while since we started to hear the waves of globalization in schools in Japan. It is not an exception for our institution, Tokyo University of Social Welfare, that now we recruit students not only from Asian countries, but also East European countries. It is often the case that English becomes the language to communicate among those international students. It has been observed that those international students communicate only in English if they are new comers and not having enough confidence to communicate in Japanese. In those opportunities to interact with students who are from Cambodia, Myanmar, Vietnam, China, Nepal, Poland and Bulgaria, they transfer their own cultural background and knowledge to communicate in English. In other words, there are certain differences in manners and ways to communicate. Drawing on conversation analysis (CA), the current study presents analysis of students’ utterances referring to turn-taking, sequence organization, lexical choice, and story telling. The study sought to find difference in utterances, reactions, and attitudes. For further discussion, the researcher suggests implications for language teaching as well as classroom practice in different English competence levels and culturally diverse students.

Notes