Steensig-Heinemann2013
| Steensig-Heinemann2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Steensig-Heinemann2013 |
| Author(s) | Jakob Steensig, Trine Heinemann |
| Title | ‘When “yes” is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question |
| Editor(s) | Beatrice Szczepek Reed, Geoffrey Raymond, |
| Tag(s) | IL, Answers, Yes/no, Danish, responses, confirmations, elaborations |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 207–242 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/slsi.25.07ste |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Units of Talk - Units of Action |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article investigates confirming answers to yes/no questions that consist of more than the type-conforming ‘yes’ token. The study is based on 160 cases of question-answer sequences with confirming answers, taken from a corpus of Danish interactions. The authors claim that certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration. The actions that have this far-reaching projection are: (1) expansion-eliciting questions, (2) knowledge discrepancy questions, and (3) specification requests. The authors found no simple relationship between syntax and action. Some of the actions that demand more than a ‘yes’ can be carried out with both interrogative and declarative syntax, whereas others are done only interrogatively.
Notes
