Steensig-Heinemann2013
Steensig-Heinemann2013 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | Steensig-Heinemann2013 |
Author(s) | Jakob Steensig, Trine Heinemann |
Title | ‘When “yes” is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question |
Editor(s) | Beatrice Szczepek Reed, Geoffrey Raymond |
Tag(s) | IL, Answers, Yes/no, Danish, responses, confirmations, elaborations |
Publisher | John Benjamins |
Year | 2013 |
Language | |
City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 207–242 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1075/slsi.25.07ste |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Units of Talk – Units of Action |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article investigates confirming answers to yes/no questions that consist of more than the type-conforming ‘yes’ token. The study is based on 160 cases of question-answer sequences with confirming answers, taken from a corpus of Danish interactions. The authors claim that certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration. The actions that have this far-reaching projection are: (1) expansion-eliciting questions, (2) knowledge discrepancy questions, and (3) specification requests. The authors found no simple relationship between syntax and action. Some of the actions that demand more than a ‘yes’ can be carried out with both interrogative and declarative syntax, whereas others are done only interrogatively.
Notes