Koole-Verberg2017
Koole-Verberg2017 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Koole-Verberg2017 |
Author(s) | Tom Koole, Nina Verberg |
Title | Aligning caller and call-taker: The opening phrase of Dutch emergency calls |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Emergency Calls, Applied Conversation Analysis, Preference organization, Type-conformity |
Publisher | |
Year | 2017 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Pragmatics and Society |
Volume | 8 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 129-153 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1075/ps.8.1.07koo |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper reports on conversation analytic research for the Dutch national emergency call-centre. In a corpus study of 120 emergency calls we show that callers’ orientations to their communicative tasks are not aligned to the institutional communicative tasks of the call-takers. In a subsequent workplace experiment involving over 2000 calls, it appeared that the use of an alternative question rather than a wh-question, significantly altered callers’ emergency deliveries and adapted them to call-takers’ communicative needs. The analysis shows two aspects of callers’ responses to the different question formats: (i) The alternative questions produced significantly more type-conforming answers than the wh-questions, and also (ii) callers treated their non-conforming answer to alternative question more often as dispreferred than their non-conforming answers to wh-questions. Callers thus treated the preference for type-conformity to be stronger for alternative questions than for wh-questions.
Notes