Koole-Verberg2017

From emcawiki
Revision as of 11:00, 3 May 2017 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Tom Koole; Nina Verberg |Title=Aligning caller and call-taker: The opening phrase of Dutch emergency calls |Tag(s)=EMCA; Emergency Calls...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Koole-Verberg2017
BibType ARTICLE
Key Koole-Verberg2017
Author(s) Tom Koole, Nina Verberg
Title Aligning caller and call-taker: The opening phrase of Dutch emergency calls
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Emergency Calls, Applied Conversation Analysis, Preference organization, Type-conformity
Publisher
Year 2017
Language
City
Month
Journal Pragmatics and Society
Volume 8
Number 1
Pages 129-153
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/ps.8.1.07koo
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper reports on conversation analytic research for the Dutch national emergency call-centre. In a corpus study of 120 emergency calls we show that callers’ orientations to their communicative tasks are not aligned to the institutional communicative tasks of the call-takers. In a subsequent workplace experiment involving over 2000 calls, it appeared that the use of an alternative question rather than a wh-question, significantly altered callers’ emergency deliveries and adapted them to call-takers’ communicative needs. The analysis shows two aspects of callers’ responses to the different question formats: (i) The alternative questions produced significantly more type-conforming answers than the wh-questions, and also (ii) callers treated their non-conforming answer to alternative question more often as dispreferred than their non-conforming answers to wh-questions. Callers thus treated the preference for type-conformity to be stronger for alternative questions than for wh-questions.

Notes