Kim2015c

From emcawiki
Revision as of 01:21, 24 January 2016 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Eunho Kim |Title=Vocabulary negotiation in the KFL classroom: Language learning opportunities through interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Classroo...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Kim2015c
BibType ARTICLE
Key Kim2015c
Author(s) Eunho Kim
Title Vocabulary negotiation in the KFL classroom: Language learning opportunities through interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Classroom, Korean, Second language acquisition, Repair
Publisher
Year 2015
Language
City
Month
Journal Acta Koreana
Volume 18
Number 2
Pages 619-648
URL Link
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.18399/acta.2015.18.2.011
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Using the micro-analytic framework of conversation analysis, this study demonstrates Korean language learners' varying repair strategies when facing vocabulary production problems. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to explore the ways in which Korean L2 learners co-construct repair sequences for vocabulary negotiation and (2) to advance our understanding of how learning opportunities are created in Korean as a Foreign Language (KFL) classroom interaction. The data analyzed for this study are drawn from approximately nineteen hours of Korean as a second language classroom conversations, involving seven students and a teacher. It specifically investigates the various organizations of repair by two different language proficiency levels: advanced and intermediate. Analysis of moment-by-moment classroom interaction reveals that advanced and intermediate learners show different preferences and utilize repair sequences in differing ways in order to negotiate target vocabulary with interactants. Participants in the interaction move back and forth between the ongoing talk and the repair sequence and collaboratively resolve their problems in ways that create opportunities for learnmg. The analysis of these practices of "vocabulary negotiation" adds to a body of work that shows how students participate in building their own learning opportunities.

Notes