Difference between revisions of "Wasson2016"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christina Wasson |Title=Integrating conversation analysis and issue framing to illuminate collaborative decision-making activities |Tag(...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 02:09, 21 July 2016
Wasson2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Wasson2016 |
Author(s) | Christina Wasson |
Title | Integrating conversation analysis and issue framing to illuminate collaborative decision-making activities |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Collaboration, Decision, Meeting interaction |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse & Communication |
Volume | 10 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 378-411 |
URL | Link |
DOI | doi: 10.1177/1750481316638153 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
A shift from top-down, hierarchical decision-making toward collaborative, consensus-oriented decision-making is taking place across many settings, leading to meetings in which diverse participants seek to reach agreement on issues of significance. This article proposes a new approach to analyzing such meetings that integrates conversation analysis (CA) and issue framing (IF). While CA and IF have both been applied to collaborative decision-making, each approach, on its own, suffers from significant limitations. Combined, they allow negotiation talk in meetings to be examined holistically, integrating a consideration of both process and content. New relationships among interactional sequences and framing processes are revealed, leading to the discovery of patterns across the decision-making activity as a whole. These patterns, in turn, can be situated in the context of the institutions within which the negotiations take place. This novel integrative approach is illuminated through application to a 162-turn decision-making activity.
Notes