Difference between revisions of "Krummheuer2015b"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-03-08 09:40:50) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=INPROCEEDINGS |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Antonia Krummheuer; |
|Title=Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction | |Title=Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction | ||
| − | | | + | |Editor(s)=Julio Abascal; Simone Barbosa; Mirko Fetter; Tom Gross; Philippe Palanque; Marco Winckler; |
|Tag(s)=AI;Embodied conversational agent;Human-agent interaction;Participation role; EMCA; AI reference list | |Tag(s)=AI;Embodied conversational agent;Human-agent interaction;Participation role; EMCA; AI reference list | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Krummheuer2015b |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Publisher=Springer International Publishing | |Publisher=Springer International Publishing | ||
| + | |Year=2015 | ||
|Address=Cham | |Address=Cham | ||
| − | | | + | |Booktitle=Human-Computer Interaction \textendash INTERACT 2015 |
|Pages=240–247 | |Pages=240–247 | ||
|DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_19 | |DOI=10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_19 | ||
| + | |ISBN=978-3-319-22723-8 | ||
| + | |Series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science | ||
|Abstract=Human-agent interaction (HAI), especially in the field of embodied conversational agents (ECA), is mainly construed as dyadic communication between a human user and a virtual agent. This is despite the fact that many application scenarios for future ECAs involve the presence of others. This paper critiques the view of an `isolated user' and proposes a micro-sociological perspective on the participation roles in HAI. Two examples of an HAI in a public setting point out (1) the ways a variety of participants take part in the interaction, (2) how the construction of the participation roles influences the construction of the agent's identity, and (3) how HAI, as a mediated interaction, is framed by an asymmetric participation framework. The paper concludes by suggesting various participation roles, which may inform development of ECAs. | |Abstract=Human-agent interaction (HAI), especially in the field of embodied conversational agents (ECA), is mainly construed as dyadic communication between a human user and a virtual agent. This is despite the fact that many application scenarios for future ECAs involve the presence of others. This paper critiques the view of an `isolated user' and proposes a micro-sociological perspective on the participation roles in HAI. Two examples of an HAI in a public setting point out (1) the ways a variety of participants take part in the interaction, (2) how the construction of the participation roles influences the construction of the agent's identity, and (3) how HAI, as a mediated interaction, is framed by an asymmetric participation framework. The paper concludes by suggesting various participation roles, which may inform development of ECAs. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 03:01, 8 March 2021
| Krummheuer2015b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INPROCEEDINGS |
| Key | Krummheuer2015b |
| Author(s) | Antonia Krummheuer |
| Title | Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction |
| Editor(s) | Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, Marco Winckler |
| Tag(s) | AI, Embodied conversational agent, Human-agent interaction, Participation role, EMCA, AI reference list |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | |
| City | Cham |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 240–247 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_19 |
| ISBN | 978-3-319-22723-8 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Human-Computer Interaction \textendash INTERACT 2015 |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Human-agent interaction (HAI), especially in the field of embodied conversational agents (ECA), is mainly construed as dyadic communication between a human user and a virtual agent. This is despite the fact that many application scenarios for future ECAs involve the presence of others. This paper critiques the view of an `isolated user' and proposes a micro-sociological perspective on the participation roles in HAI. Two examples of an HAI in a public setting point out (1) the ways a variety of participants take part in the interaction, (2) how the construction of the participation roles influences the construction of the agent's identity, and (3) how HAI, as a mediated interaction, is framed by an asymmetric participation framework. The paper concludes by suggesting various participation roles, which may inform development of ECAs.
Notes
