Difference between revisions of "Wasson2016"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Wasson2016 | |Key=Wasson2016 | ||
|Year=2016 | |Year=2016 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse & Communication | |Journal=Discourse & Communication | ||
|Volume=10 | |Volume=10 | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=378–411 |
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1750481316638153 |
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1177/1750481316638153 |
|Abstract=A shift from top-down, hierarchical decision-making toward collaborative, consensus-oriented decision-making is taking place across many settings, leading to meetings in which diverse participants seek to reach agreement on issues of significance. This article proposes a new approach to analyzing such meetings that integrates conversation analysis (CA) and issue framing (IF). While CA and IF have both been applied to collaborative decision-making, each approach, on its own, suffers from significant limitations. Combined, they allow negotiation talk in meetings to be examined holistically, integrating a consideration of both process and content. New relationships among interactional sequences and framing processes are revealed, leading to the discovery of patterns across the decision-making activity as a whole. These patterns, in turn, can be situated in the context of the institutions within which the negotiations take place. This novel integrative approach is illuminated through application to a 162-turn decision-making activity. | |Abstract=A shift from top-down, hierarchical decision-making toward collaborative, consensus-oriented decision-making is taking place across many settings, leading to meetings in which diverse participants seek to reach agreement on issues of significance. This article proposes a new approach to analyzing such meetings that integrates conversation analysis (CA) and issue framing (IF). While CA and IF have both been applied to collaborative decision-making, each approach, on its own, suffers from significant limitations. Combined, they allow negotiation talk in meetings to be examined holistically, integrating a consideration of both process and content. New relationships among interactional sequences and framing processes are revealed, leading to the discovery of patterns across the decision-making activity as a whole. These patterns, in turn, can be situated in the context of the institutions within which the negotiations take place. This novel integrative approach is illuminated through application to a 162-turn decision-making activity. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:19, 21 December 2019
| Wasson2016 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Wasson2016 |
| Author(s) | Christina Wasson |
| Title | Integrating conversation analysis and issue framing to illuminate collaborative decision-making activities |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Meeting interaction, Collaboration, conversation analysis, decision-making, ethnography, integration of methods, issue framing, meetings, negotiation, participation |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2016 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Communication |
| Volume | 10 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 378–411 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1750481316638153 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
A shift from top-down, hierarchical decision-making toward collaborative, consensus-oriented decision-making is taking place across many settings, leading to meetings in which diverse participants seek to reach agreement on issues of significance. This article proposes a new approach to analyzing such meetings that integrates conversation analysis (CA) and issue framing (IF). While CA and IF have both been applied to collaborative decision-making, each approach, on its own, suffers from significant limitations. Combined, they allow negotiation talk in meetings to be examined holistically, integrating a consideration of both process and content. New relationships among interactional sequences and framing processes are revealed, leading to the discovery of patterns across the decision-making activity as a whole. These patterns, in turn, can be situated in the context of the institutions within which the negotiations take place. This novel integrative approach is illuminated through application to a 162-turn decision-making activity.
Notes
