Difference between revisions of "Cromdal-Persson-Thunqvist-Osvaldsson2012"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Cromdal-Persson-Thunqvist;Osvaldsson2012 to Cromdal-Persson-Thunqvist-Osvaldsson2012 without leaving a redirect) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Jakob Cromdal; Daniel Persson-Thunqvist; Karin Osvaldsson; | |Author(s)=Jakob Cromdal; Daniel Persson-Thunqvist; Karin Osvaldsson; | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=“SOS 112 what has occurred?” Managing openings in children's emergency calls |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Emergency Calls; Children; Opening sequences; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Emergency Calls; Children; Opening sequences; | ||
|Key=Cromdal-Persson-Thunqvist-Osvaldsson2012 | |Key=Cromdal-Persson-Thunqvist-Osvaldsson2012 | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Discourse, Context & Media | |Journal=Discourse, Context & Media | ||
|Volume=1 | |Volume=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=4 |
| + | |Pages=183–202 | ||
| + | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695812000475 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1016/j.dcm.2012.10.002 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This article examines the initial exchanges in calls to the Swedish emergency services, focusing on callers’ responses to the standardised opening phrase SOS one one two, what has occurred?. Comparisons across three age groups – children, teenagers, and adults – revealed significant differences in caller behaviour. Whereas teenagers and adults offered reports of the incident, child callers were more prone to request dispatch of specific assistance units. This pattern was only observable when children were accompanied by an adult relative, which leads us to propose that child callers may be operating under prior adult instruction concerning how to request help. The second part of the analysis examines the local organisation of participants’ actions, showing how turn-design and sequencing manifest the local concerns of the two parties. The analysis thus combines quantitative and qualitative methods to explore the ways through which the parties jointly produce an early sense of emergency incidents. These results are discussed in terms of children’s agency and competence as informants granted to them by emergency operators, and how such competence ascriptions run against commonsense conceptualisations of children as less-than-full-fledged members of society. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 04:17, 26 February 2016
| Cromdal-Persson-Thunqvist-Osvaldsson2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Cromdal-Persson-Thunqvist-Osvaldsson2012 |
| Author(s) | Jakob Cromdal, Daniel Persson-Thunqvist, Karin Osvaldsson |
| Title | “SOS 112 what has occurred?” Managing openings in children's emergency calls |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Emergency Calls, Children, Opening sequences |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse, Context & Media |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 183–202 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.10.002 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article examines the initial exchanges in calls to the Swedish emergency services, focusing on callers’ responses to the standardised opening phrase SOS one one two, what has occurred?. Comparisons across three age groups – children, teenagers, and adults – revealed significant differences in caller behaviour. Whereas teenagers and adults offered reports of the incident, child callers were more prone to request dispatch of specific assistance units. This pattern was only observable when children were accompanied by an adult relative, which leads us to propose that child callers may be operating under prior adult instruction concerning how to request help. The second part of the analysis examines the local organisation of participants’ actions, showing how turn-design and sequencing manifest the local concerns of the two parties. The analysis thus combines quantitative and qualitative methods to explore the ways through which the parties jointly produce an early sense of emergency incidents. These results are discussed in terms of children’s agency and competence as informants granted to them by emergency operators, and how such competence ascriptions run against commonsense conceptualisations of children as less-than-full-fledged members of society.
Notes
