Difference between revisions of "Pfander2014"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Stefan Pfänder; Marie Skrovec |Title=Fishing for affiliation. The French double causal construction ‘parce que comme’ from a d...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=INCOLLECTION | |BibType=INCOLLECTION | ||
|Author(s)=Stefan Pfänder; Marie Skrovec | |Author(s)=Stefan Pfänder; Marie Skrovec | ||
| − | |Title=Fishing for affiliation | + | |Title=Fishing for affiliation: the French double causal construction ‘parce que comme’ from a dialogical linguistics perspective |
| − | |Editor(s)=Susanne Günther; Wolfgang Imo; Jörg Bücker; | + | |Editor(s)=Susanne Günther; Wolfgang Imo; Jörg Bücker; |
| − | |Tag(s)=French; Affiliation; Grammar; Interactional Linguistics; EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=French; Affiliation; Grammar; Interactional Linguistics; EMCA; |
|Key=Pfander2014 | |Key=Pfander2014 | ||
| + | |Publisher=De Gruyter Mouton | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
| + | |Address=Berlin | ||
|Booktitle=Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation | |Booktitle=Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation | ||
| − | | | + | |Pages=241–268 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110358612/9783110358612.241/9783110358612.241.xml |
|DOI=10.1515/9783110358612.241 | |DOI=10.1515/9783110358612.241 | ||
| − | |Series=Linguistik | + | |Series=Linguistik — Impulse & Tendenzen |
| + | |Abstract=This contribution to the volume examines data demonstrating the presence of a double causal construction conjunction parce que comme ‘because since’, in French interactional contexts. The construction is analysed here as an on-line resource (Auer 2009, Auer/Pfänder 2011) for dialogue. This is shown to occur when participants wish to not only account for a prior action, but also to ensure that their interlocutors can fully understand the reason for and therefore better deal with the claim. That is, when they want others to display affliliation with their activity. In this case affliliation refers to a whole-hearted and overt comprehension and acceptance of a request or statement related to a prior request. In this sense, the double causal construction contributes to “fishing” for such affiliation. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:02, 7 December 2019
| Pfander2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Pfander2014 |
| Author(s) | Stefan Pfänder, Marie Skrovec |
| Title | Fishing for affiliation: the French double causal construction ‘parce que comme’ from a dialogical linguistics perspective |
| Editor(s) | Susanne Günther, Wolfgang Imo, Jörg Bücker |
| Tag(s) | French, Affiliation, Grammar, Interactional Linguistics, EMCA |
| Publisher | De Gruyter Mouton |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | English |
| City | Berlin |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 241–268 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/9783110358612.241 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | Linguistik — Impulse & Tendenzen |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This contribution to the volume examines data demonstrating the presence of a double causal construction conjunction parce que comme ‘because since’, in French interactional contexts. The construction is analysed here as an on-line resource (Auer 2009, Auer/Pfänder 2011) for dialogue. This is shown to occur when participants wish to not only account for a prior action, but also to ensure that their interlocutors can fully understand the reason for and therefore better deal with the claim. That is, when they want others to display affliliation with their activity. In this case affliliation refers to a whole-hearted and overt comprehension and acceptance of a request or statement related to a prior request. In this sense, the double causal construction contributes to “fishing” for such affiliation.
Notes
