Difference between revisions of "Krummheuer2015b"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "Antonia Krummheuer" to "Antonia Lina Krummheuer") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=INPROCEEDINGS | |BibType=INPROCEEDINGS | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Antonia Krummheuer; | + | |Author(s)=Antonia Lina Krummheuer; |
|Title=Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction | |Title=Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction | ||
|Editor(s)=Julio Abascal; Simone Barbosa; Mirko Fetter; Tom Gross; Philippe Palanque; Marco Winckler; | |Editor(s)=Julio Abascal; Simone Barbosa; Mirko Fetter; Tom Gross; Philippe Palanque; Marco Winckler; | ||
Latest revision as of 09:24, 8 March 2021
| Krummheuer2015b | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INPROCEEDINGS |
| Key | Krummheuer2015b |
| Author(s) | Antonia Lina Krummheuer |
| Title | Users, Bystanders and Agents: Participation Roles in Human-Agent Interaction |
| Editor(s) | Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, Marco Winckler |
| Tag(s) | AI, Embodied conversational agent, Human-agent interaction, Participation role, EMCA, AI reference list |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Year | 2015 |
| Language | |
| City | Cham |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 240–247 |
| URL | |
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_19 |
| ISBN | 978-3-319-22723-8 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2015 |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Human-agent interaction (HAI), especially in the field of embodied conversational agents (ECA), is mainly construed as dyadic communication between a human user and a virtual agent. This is despite the fact that many application scenarios for future ECAs involve the presence of others. This paper critiques the view of an `isolated user' and proposes a micro-sociological perspective on the participation roles in HAI. Two examples of an HAI in a public setting point out (1) the ways a variety of participants take part in the interaction, (2) how the construction of the participation roles influences the construction of the agent's identity, and (3) how HAI, as a mediated interaction, is framed by an asymmetric participation framework. The paper concludes by suggesting various participation roles, which may inform development of ECAs.
Notes
