Difference between revisions of "LoYu2020"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Carol Hoi Yee Lo; Di Yu; |Title=Enabling institutional messaging: TV journalists’ work with interviewee responses. |Editor(s)=Hansun Z...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | |BibType= | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
|Author(s)=Carol Hoi Yee Lo; Di Yu; | |Author(s)=Carol Hoi Yee Lo; Di Yu; | ||
− | |Title=Enabling institutional messaging: TV journalists’ work with interviewee responses | + | |Title=Enabling institutional messaging: TV journalists’ work with interviewee responses |
− | |Editor(s)=Hansun Zhang Waring | + | |Editor(s)=Hansun Zhang Waring; Elizabeth Reddington; |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | ||
|Key=LoYu2020 | |Key=LoYu2020 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Address=London, UK | |Address=London, UK | ||
− | |Booktitle=Communicating with the | + | |Booktitle=Communicating with the Public: Conversation Analytic Studies |
+ | |Pages=49–66 | ||
+ | |URL=https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/communicating-with-the-public-conversation-analytic-studies/ch3-enabling-institutional-messaging-tv-journalists-work-with-interviewee-responses | ||
+ | |DOI=10.5040/9781350098213.ch-003 | ||
|Abstract=In public broadcasting, the primary goal of interviewing an expert is to inform and educate the audience for the benefit of societal interests (Clayman, 2013). Previous work on news interviews has noted that this type of public discourse not only involves the host and the expert, but also an overhearing audience (Clayman & Heritage, 2002; Hutchby, 1995); moreover, the host is positioned as the “tribune” of the people (Clayman, 2002), tasked with the responsibility to maximize the public’s understanding of and knowledge about what may concern them. While the audience as the third party in the question-answer sequence in news interviews has received considerable attention in the literature, less is known about how the interviewer works with the health expert’s responses to questions in order to facilitate the audience’s understanding of health initiatives. In this paper, we examine how the interviewer designs a follow-up turn to (1) provide background or supplemental information which contextualizes the interviewee's prior response and to (2) reformulate the expert’s explanation from the perspective of the general public, thereby facilitating the audience’s understanding of initiatives pertaining to public health. | |Abstract=In public broadcasting, the primary goal of interviewing an expert is to inform and educate the audience for the benefit of societal interests (Clayman, 2013). Previous work on news interviews has noted that this type of public discourse not only involves the host and the expert, but also an overhearing audience (Clayman & Heritage, 2002; Hutchby, 1995); moreover, the host is positioned as the “tribune” of the people (Clayman, 2002), tasked with the responsibility to maximize the public’s understanding of and knowledge about what may concern them. While the audience as the third party in the question-answer sequence in news interviews has received considerable attention in the literature, less is known about how the interviewer works with the health expert’s responses to questions in order to facilitate the audience’s understanding of health initiatives. In this paper, we examine how the interviewer designs a follow-up turn to (1) provide background or supplemental information which contextualizes the interviewee's prior response and to (2) reformulate the expert’s explanation from the perspective of the general public, thereby facilitating the audience’s understanding of initiatives pertaining to public health. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 01:31, 3 July 2023
LoYu2020 | |
---|---|
BibType | INCOLLECTION |
Key | LoYu2020 |
Author(s) | Carol Hoi Yee Lo, Di Yu |
Title | Enabling institutional messaging: TV journalists’ work with interviewee responses |
Editor(s) | Hansun Zhang Waring, Elizabeth Reddington |
Tag(s) | EMCA |
Publisher | Bloomsbury |
Year | 2020 |
Language | English |
City | London, UK |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 49–66 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.5040/9781350098213.ch-003 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | Communicating with the Public: Conversation Analytic Studies |
Chapter |
Abstract
In public broadcasting, the primary goal of interviewing an expert is to inform and educate the audience for the benefit of societal interests (Clayman, 2013). Previous work on news interviews has noted that this type of public discourse not only involves the host and the expert, but also an overhearing audience (Clayman & Heritage, 2002; Hutchby, 1995); moreover, the host is positioned as the “tribune” of the people (Clayman, 2002), tasked with the responsibility to maximize the public’s understanding of and knowledge about what may concern them. While the audience as the third party in the question-answer sequence in news interviews has received considerable attention in the literature, less is known about how the interviewer works with the health expert’s responses to questions in order to facilitate the audience’s understanding of health initiatives. In this paper, we examine how the interviewer designs a follow-up turn to (1) provide background or supplemental information which contextualizes the interviewee's prior response and to (2) reformulate the expert’s explanation from the perspective of the general public, thereby facilitating the audience’s understanding of initiatives pertaining to public health.
Notes