Difference between revisions of "Stevanovic-Kuusisto2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Melisa Stevanovic; Arniika Kuusisto; |Title=Teacher directives in children’s musical instrument instruction: Activity context, student...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page Stevanovic-Kuusisto2018 to Stevanovic-Kuusisto2019 without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Title=Teacher directives in children’s musical instrument instruction: Activity context, student cooperation, and institutional priority | |Title=Teacher directives in children’s musical instrument instruction: Activity context, student cooperation, and institutional priority | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Directives; music education; music instrument instruction; conversation analysis; Finnish | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Directives; music education; music instrument instruction; conversation analysis; Finnish | ||
| − | |Key=Stevanovic- | + | |Key=Stevanovic-Kuusisto2019 |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2019 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research | |Journal=Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research | ||
| − | |URL=https://doi | + | |Volume=63 |
| − | |DOI= | + | |Number=7 |
| + | |Pages=1022–1040 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00313831.2018.1476405 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/00313831.2018.1476405 | ||
|Abstract=Identifying precisely what teachers do to elicit desired changes in their students’ knowledge and skill is a long-lasting challenge of educational research. Here, we use conversation analysis to contribute to a deeper understanding of this matter by considering how Finnish-speaking musical instrument teachers use directives to guide their students. Our data consist of 10 video-recorded instrument lessons (violin, piano, guitar, and ukulele). In our findings, we provide an account for the variance in the musical instrument teachers’ use of six second-person directive forms in Finnish. We argue that the teachers’ choices between these directive forms are warranted by three dimensions of the participants’ conduct: (1) location of the directive within the participants’ wider activity structure, (2) degree of the student’s cooperation at the given moment, and (3) the institutional priority of action that is being called for. | |Abstract=Identifying precisely what teachers do to elicit desired changes in their students’ knowledge and skill is a long-lasting challenge of educational research. Here, we use conversation analysis to contribute to a deeper understanding of this matter by considering how Finnish-speaking musical instrument teachers use directives to guide their students. Our data consist of 10 video-recorded instrument lessons (violin, piano, guitar, and ukulele). In our findings, we provide an account for the variance in the musical instrument teachers’ use of six second-person directive forms in Finnish. We argue that the teachers’ choices between these directive forms are warranted by three dimensions of the participants’ conduct: (1) location of the directive within the participants’ wider activity structure, (2) degree of the student’s cooperation at the given moment, and (3) the institutional priority of action that is being called for. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:44, 12 January 2020
| Stevanovic-Kuusisto2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stevanovic-Kuusisto2019 |
| Author(s) | Melisa Stevanovic, Arniika Kuusisto |
| Title | Teacher directives in children’s musical instrument instruction: Activity context, student cooperation, and institutional priority |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Directives, music education, music instrument instruction, conversation analysis, Finnish |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research |
| Volume | 63 |
| Number | 7 |
| Pages | 1022–1040 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/00313831.2018.1476405 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Identifying precisely what teachers do to elicit desired changes in their students’ knowledge and skill is a long-lasting challenge of educational research. Here, we use conversation analysis to contribute to a deeper understanding of this matter by considering how Finnish-speaking musical instrument teachers use directives to guide their students. Our data consist of 10 video-recorded instrument lessons (violin, piano, guitar, and ukulele). In our findings, we provide an account for the variance in the musical instrument teachers’ use of six second-person directive forms in Finnish. We argue that the teachers’ choices between these directive forms are warranted by three dimensions of the participants’ conduct: (1) location of the directive within the participants’ wider activity structure, (2) degree of the student’s cooperation at the given moment, and (3) the institutional priority of action that is being called for.
Notes
