Difference between revisions of "Housley2018"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2018-05-18 08:24:04) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
− | | | + | |Author(s)=William Housley; |
|Title=Conversation analysis, publics, practitioners and citizen social science | |Title=Conversation analysis, publics, practitioners and citizen social science | ||
− | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; citizen social science; Conversation Analysis; conversational rollercoaster; Ethnomethodology; publics | |
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; citizen social science | + | |Key=Housley2018 |
− | | | ||
|Year=2018 | |Year=2018 | ||
+ | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=20 | |Volume=20 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=431–437 |
− | |URL=https://doi | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445618754581 |
|DOI=10.1177/1461445618754581 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445618754581 | ||
|Abstract=During the course of this short article, I respond and connect with insights and issues raised by the Conversational Rollercoaster (CR) and its relationship with conversation analysis (CA) and the public science of talk. I constructively engage with the innovative thinking and practice associated with this initiative. Finally, I consider how this might enhance a potential drive to connect ethnomethodology (EM) and CA to additional public and collaborative practices and interventions in the digital age. | |Abstract=During the course of this short article, I respond and connect with insights and issues raised by the Conversational Rollercoaster (CR) and its relationship with conversation analysis (CA) and the public science of talk. I constructively engage with the innovative thinking and practice associated with this initiative. Finally, I consider how this might enhance a potential drive to connect ethnomethodology (EM) and CA to additional public and collaborative practices and interventions in the digital age. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 05:54, 13 January 2020
Housley2018 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Housley2018 |
Author(s) | William Housley |
Title | Conversation analysis, publics, practitioners and citizen social science |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, citizen social science, Conversation Analysis, conversational rollercoaster, Ethnomethodology, publics |
Publisher | |
Year | 2018 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse Studies |
Volume | 20 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 431–437 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1461445618754581 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
During the course of this short article, I respond and connect with insights and issues raised by the Conversational Rollercoaster (CR) and its relationship with conversation analysis (CA) and the public science of talk. I constructively engage with the innovative thinking and practice associated with this initiative. Finally, I consider how this might enhance a potential drive to connect ethnomethodology (EM) and CA to additional public and collaborative practices and interventions in the digital age.
Notes