Difference between revisions of "VanCharldorp2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Tessa Van Charldorp | |Author(s)=Tessa Van Charldorp | ||
|Title=The intertwining of talk and technology: How talk and typing are combined in the various phases of the police interrogation | |Title=The intertwining of talk and technology: How talk and typing are combined in the various phases of the police interrogation | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Conversation Analysis; police; police interrogation; police record; suspect; technology; typing; |
|Key=VanCharldorp2013 | |Key=VanCharldorp2013 | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=221–240 | |Pages=221–240 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1750481313476776 |
|DOI=10.1177/1750481313476776 | |DOI=10.1177/1750481313476776 | ||
|Abstract=Different institutional tasks are accomplished in the Dutch police interrogation: from filling in required paperwork, to getting the confession (or truth) on paper, to editing the text of the written statement. All these different phases have different goals and go hand in hand with different typing practices. The intertwining of these activities in the various phases of the police interrogation is of interest because it demonstrates that these two activities and the way they influence and structure each other in interaction are related to the institutional goal of that phase. Subsequently, this may have an effect on the product that is being constructed – the police record. | |Abstract=Different institutional tasks are accomplished in the Dutch police interrogation: from filling in required paperwork, to getting the confession (or truth) on paper, to editing the text of the written statement. All these different phases have different goals and go hand in hand with different typing practices. The intertwining of these activities in the various phases of the police interrogation is of interest because it demonstrates that these two activities and the way they influence and structure each other in interaction are related to the institutional goal of that phase. Subsequently, this may have an effect on the product that is being constructed – the police record. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:06, 2 December 2019
| VanCharldorp2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | VanCharldorp2013 |
| Author(s) | Tessa Van Charldorp |
| Title | The intertwining of talk and technology: How talk and typing are combined in the various phases of the police interrogation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation Analysis, police, police interrogation, police record, suspect, technology, typing |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Communication |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 221–240 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1750481313476776 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Different institutional tasks are accomplished in the Dutch police interrogation: from filling in required paperwork, to getting the confession (or truth) on paper, to editing the text of the written statement. All these different phases have different goals and go hand in hand with different typing practices. The intertwining of these activities in the various phases of the police interrogation is of interest because it demonstrates that these two activities and the way they influence and structure each other in interaction are related to the institutional goal of that phase. Subsequently, this may have an effect on the product that is being constructed – the police record.
Notes
