Difference between revisions of "Steensig-Heinemann2013"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INCOLLECTION |Author(s)=Jakob Steensig; Trine Heinemann; |Title=‘When “yes” is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question |Editor(s)=Beatrice S...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Jakob Steensig; Trine Heinemann; | |Author(s)=Jakob Steensig; Trine Heinemann; | ||
|Title=‘When “yes” is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question | |Title=‘When “yes” is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question | ||
| − | |Editor(s)=Beatrice Szczepek Reed; Geoffrey Raymond | + | |Editor(s)=Beatrice Szczepek Reed; Geoffrey Raymond; |
|Tag(s)=IL; Answers; Yes/no; Danish; responses; confirmations; elaborations; | |Tag(s)=IL; Answers; Yes/no; Danish; responses; confirmations; elaborations; | ||
|Key=Steensig-Heinemann2013 | |Key=Steensig-Heinemann2013 | ||
| − | |Publisher=John Benjamins | + | |Publisher=John Benjamins |
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | |Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia | ||
| − | |Booktitle=Units | + | |Booktitle=Units of Talk – Units of Action |
|Pages=207–242 | |Pages=207–242 | ||
| − | |URL=https:// | + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/slsi.25.07ste |
|DOI=10.1075/slsi.25.07ste | |DOI=10.1075/slsi.25.07ste | ||
|Abstract=This article investigates confirming answers to yes/no questions that consist of more than the type-conforming ‘yes’ token. The study is based on 160 cases of question-answer sequences with confirming answers, taken from a corpus of Danish interactions. The authors claim that certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration. The actions that have this far-reaching projection are: (1) expansion-eliciting questions, (2) knowledge discrepancy questions, and (3) specification requests. The authors found no simple relationship between syntax and action. Some of the actions that demand more than a ‘yes’ can be carried out with both interrogative and declarative syntax, whereas others are done only interrogatively. | |Abstract=This article investigates confirming answers to yes/no questions that consist of more than the type-conforming ‘yes’ token. The study is based on 160 cases of question-answer sequences with confirming answers, taken from a corpus of Danish interactions. The authors claim that certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration. The actions that have this far-reaching projection are: (1) expansion-eliciting questions, (2) knowledge discrepancy questions, and (3) specification requests. The authors found no simple relationship between syntax and action. Some of the actions that demand more than a ‘yes’ can be carried out with both interrogative and declarative syntax, whereas others are done only interrogatively. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:25, 2 December 2019
| Steensig-Heinemann2013 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Steensig-Heinemann2013 |
| Author(s) | Jakob Steensig, Trine Heinemann |
| Title | ‘When “yes” is not enough – as an answer to a yes/no question |
| Editor(s) | Beatrice Szczepek Reed, Geoffrey Raymond |
| Tag(s) | IL, Answers, Yes/no, Danish, responses, confirmations, elaborations |
| Publisher | John Benjamins |
| Year | 2013 |
| Language | |
| City | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 207–242 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/slsi.25.07ste |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Units of Talk – Units of Action |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article investigates confirming answers to yes/no questions that consist of more than the type-conforming ‘yes’ token. The study is based on 160 cases of question-answer sequences with confirming answers, taken from a corpus of Danish interactions. The authors claim that certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration. The actions that have this far-reaching projection are: (1) expansion-eliciting questions, (2) knowledge discrepancy questions, and (3) specification requests. The authors found no simple relationship between syntax and action. Some of the actions that demand more than a ‘yes’ can be carried out with both interrogative and declarative syntax, whereas others are done only interrogatively.
Notes
