Difference between revisions of "Drew2014"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Paul Drew; Merran Toerien; Annie Irvine; Roy Sainsbury; | |Author(s)=Paul Drew; Merran Toerien; Annie Irvine; Roy Sainsbury; | ||
| − | |Title=Personal | + | |Title=Personal adviser interviews with benefits claimants in UK jobcentres |
| − | |Tag(s)=Interview; Intervention; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interview; Intervention; |
|Key=Drew2014 | |Key=Drew2014 | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
| − | | | + | |Language=English |
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=47 | |Volume=47 | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.2014.925669 | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.2014.925669 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2014.925669 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2014.925669 | ||
| + | |Abstract=We report on a study commissioned by the UK government of the ways in which advisers conduct mandatory interviews with unemployment benefits claimants. Among other results, we identified practices in soliciting claimants’ job goals and job plans that were more, or less, effective in achieving desired outcomes during these interactions. Moreover, we found that making a calculation of how much better off a claimant would be by retaining some benefit and working part-time was ineffective. Our reports, recommendations, and presentation to officials of the Department of Work & Pensions were acknowledged to have influenced policy changes concerning Jobcentre service delivery. Data are in British English. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:06, 6 December 2019
| Drew2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Drew2014 |
| Author(s) | Paul Drew, Merran Toerien, Annie Irvine, Roy Sainsbury |
| Title | Personal adviser interviews with benefits claimants in UK jobcentres |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Interview, Intervention |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 47 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 306–316 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2014.925669 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
We report on a study commissioned by the UK government of the ways in which advisers conduct mandatory interviews with unemployment benefits claimants. Among other results, we identified practices in soliciting claimants’ job goals and job plans that were more, or less, effective in achieving desired outcomes during these interactions. Moreover, we found that making a calculation of how much better off a claimant would be by retaining some benefit and working part-time was ineffective. Our reports, recommendations, and presentation to officials of the Department of Work & Pensions were acknowledged to have influenced policy changes concerning Jobcentre service delivery. Data are in British English.
Notes
