Difference between revisions of "Nielsen2013"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Nielsen2015 to Nielsen2013 without leaving a redirect) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Mie Femø Nielsen; | |Author(s)=Mie Femø Nielsen; | ||
− | |Title=“Stepping | + | |Title=“Stepping stones” in opening and closing department meetings |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; business meeting; interaction; opening; closing; boundary procedure; formality; turn taking; chairing; conversation analysis; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; business meeting; interaction; opening; closing; boundary procedure; formality; turn taking; chairing; conversation analysis; | ||
|Key=Nielsen2013 | |Key=Nielsen2013 | ||
|Year=2013 | |Year=2013 | ||
+ | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=International Journal of Business Communication | |Journal=International Journal of Business Communication | ||
|Volume=50 | |Volume=50 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=34–67 |
+ | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0021943612465182 | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1177/0021943612465182 | ||
|Abstract=This article gives a canonical sequential analysis of openings and closings based on a corpus of department meetings. The first section of the article shows how opening a meeting constitutes a shift in turn-taking system. The second section identifies five techniques used in opening meetings. The third section identifies six techniques used in closing meetings. The final section of the article concludes how openings and closings mirror each other, with similar “stepping stones” to be “traveled”; and discusses the potential of this being a canonical and cross-cultural model. The study has implications for the community of conversation analysts, for business communication studies, and for practitioners. | |Abstract=This article gives a canonical sequential analysis of openings and closings based on a corpus of department meetings. The first section of the article shows how opening a meeting constitutes a shift in turn-taking system. The second section identifies five techniques used in opening meetings. The third section identifies six techniques used in closing meetings. The final section of the article concludes how openings and closings mirror each other, with similar “stepping stones” to be “traveled”; and discusses the potential of this being a canonical and cross-cultural model. The study has implications for the community of conversation analysts, for business communication studies, and for practitioners. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 06:40, 4 December 2019
Nielsen2013 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Nielsen2013 |
Author(s) | Mie Femø Nielsen |
Title | “Stepping stones” in opening and closing department meetings |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, business meeting, interaction, opening, closing, boundary procedure, formality, turn taking, chairing, conversation analysis |
Publisher | |
Year | 2013 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | International Journal of Business Communication |
Volume | 50 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 34–67 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/0021943612465182 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article gives a canonical sequential analysis of openings and closings based on a corpus of department meetings. The first section of the article shows how opening a meeting constitutes a shift in turn-taking system. The second section identifies five techniques used in opening meetings. The third section identifies six techniques used in closing meetings. The final section of the article concludes how openings and closings mirror each other, with similar “stepping stones” to be “traveled”; and discusses the potential of this being a canonical and cross-cultural model. The study has implications for the community of conversation analysts, for business communication studies, and for practitioners.
Notes