Waring-etal2012
| Waring-etal2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Waring-etal2012 |
| Author(s) | Hansun Zhang Waring, Sarah Creider, Tara Tarpey, Rebecca Black |
| Title | A search for specificity in understanding CA and context |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Context, Conversation Analysis, Ethnography, Talk-Extrinsic Data, Languages & Literatures, Psychology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 477–492 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445611433787 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
The conversation analytic view of context is often critiqued as being too narrow. In this article, we join the ongoing debate regarding conversation analysis (CA) and context by 1) synthesizing existing scholarly attempts at either conceptualizing or exploring the possibilities of combining CA and ethnography and 2) giving further considerations to whether or how resorting to talk-extrinsic data may be beneficial. We do so by providing four illustrative cases, with increasing complexity, from four different settings. In each case, an initial CA analysis is followed up with an informal ethnographic interview with the participants. By offering some specificity to this ongoing methodological controversy regarding talk-extrinsic data, we aim to begin building a useful framework within which further discussions on analysis, context, and cross-fertilization may proceed.
Notes
