Roulston-etal2001
| Roulston-etal2001 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Roulston-etal2001 |
| Author(s) | Kathryn J. Roulston, Carolyn D. Baker, Anna Liljestrom |
| Title | Analyzing the Researcher's Work in Generating Data: The Case of Complaints |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Research Interviews, Co-construction of research interviews, Complaint stories |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2001 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Qualitative Inquiry |
| Volume | 7 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 745–772 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/107780040100700607 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article investigates the researcher's work in the coproduction (or not) of complaint sequences in research interviews. Using a conversation analytic approach, we show how the interviewer's management of complaint sequences in a research setting is consequential for subsequent talk and thus directly affects the data generated. In the examples shown here, researchers sharing cocategorial incumbency with respondents may well provide spaces for research participants to formulate complaints. This article examines sequences of talk surrounding complaints to show how researchers generate complaints (or not) and handle unsafe complaints. Researchers are able to provoke specific types of accounts from respondents, whereas their respondents may actively resist the researchers’ direction. For researchers using the interview as a method of data generation, examination of complaint sequences and how these appear in interview data provides insight into how interview talk is coproduced and managed within a socially situated setting.
Notes
