Peyrot1995a
| Peyrot1995a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Peyrot1995a |
| Author(s) | Mark Peyrot |
| Title | Psychological testing and forensic decision-making: the properties-in-use of the MMPI |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnography, Forensics, Psychological Testing |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1995 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Problems |
| Volume | 42 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 574–586 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.2307/3097047 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper reports an ethnographic study of the use of psychological testing in decision making by a forensic psychiatry organization that makes recommendations to the courts regarding criminal justice, child custody, and workmen's compensation cases. Psychological testing using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) supports the decision-making process. Through a variety of interpretive practices, the staff deals with contradictions between the MMPI and other clinical information, while maintaining the sense that the MMPI is a valuable tool that can provide valid assessments. Test results are generally accepted when they indicate a client problem but are likely to be rejected when they indicate no problem and other clinical information suggests that a problem does exist. The logic associated with these interpretive practices is examined.
Notes
