Okazawa2022a
Okazawa2022a | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Okazawa2022a |
Author(s) | Ryo Okazawa, Ken Kawamura |
Title | The Visual and Conversational Order of Membership Categories in Fictional Films |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Film, Movie, Membership Categorization Analysis, MCA |
Publisher | |
Year | 2022 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Human Studies |
Volume | 45 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 551-576 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1007/s10746-022-09635-5 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This paper demonstrates an empirical analysis of the visual order of membership categories in a way consistent with both an early ethnomethodological research interest and recent arguments in membership categorization analysis. Early ethnomethodological studies have highlighted that we can infer and understand the membership categories of observed people about whom we have no information in advance, even without talking to them. Recent membership categorization analysts have argued the methodological importance of using video data. Given this, fictional films serve as video data to advance the investigation into the visual order of membership categories since audiences do not know the fictional characters’ information in advance and cannot talk to them. We analyze how potential audiences understand fictional characters’ membership categories and how production crew members organize the visual and conversational order of membership categories. The analysis illustrates that our practical inferences of fictional characters’ membership categories are based on conversations among characters and visually available information. Such visually available information includes environments and lighting, as well as characters’ clothes, body orientations, facial expressions, and physical distance from each other. In other words, production crew members of fictional films design the visual and conversational order for remote audiences by arranging visually available information and fictional characters’ conversations. The findings provide insights into the “possible correctness” and “defeasibility” of membership categorization practices. Particularly regarding fictional characters’ membership categories, production crew members can employ the “possible correctness” and “defeasibility” of categorization practices to mislead audiences.
Notes