OKeefe1979

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
OKeefe1979
BibType ARTICLE
Key OKeefe1979
Author(s) Daniel J. O'Keefe
Title Ethnomethodology
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Harold Garfinkel, Aaron Cicourel
Publisher
Year 1979
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Volume 9
Number 2
Pages 187–219
URL Link
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1979.tb00423.x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The 1967 publication of Harold Garfinkel’s Studies in Ethnomethodology marked the institutionalization of ‘ethnomethodology’ as a theoretical viewpoint in the social sciences. While ethnomethodology has since been the subject of extensive debate and discussion, this essay argues that certain key features of Garfinkel’s work have generally been unsatisfactorily grasped by commentators and critics. Briefly, the argument will be this. Ethnomethodology has typically been assimilated to that general viewpoint that takes social interaction to be rule-generated. While this reading roughly fits the work of one prominent ethnomethodologist, Aaron Cicourel (section I), Harold Garfinkel’s view is quite different in critically important respects (section II). Cicourel and Garfinkel exemplify two quite distinct orientations within ethnomethodology, and the differences between the two can be seen as grounded in divergent intellectual foundations (section III). It will be argued, however, that the Garfinkelian foundations have important defects (section IV). A concluding section contains some caveats concerning the main arguments of the essay (section V).

Notes